Skip to main content

Roman Catholic Apologists Are Just Chewing Themselves Whenever They Quote Mark 7:8-13 Against Born Again Christians

It's very amazing to how Roman Catholic apologists can really chew themselves out whenever they misquote the Bible.  That is why it's important for every serious born again Christian apologist to use exegesis or learning more about Scripture in context lest they go ranting "to him that pisseth against the wall" out of context.

Let's read Mark 7:8-13 from the Good News Translation which is commonly used by Roman Catholics saying:
"You put aside God's command and obey human teachings.  And Jesus continued, You have a clever way of rejecting God's law in order to uphold your own teaching.  For Moses commanded, Respect your father and your mother, and, If you curse your father or your mother, you are to be put to death.  But you teach that if people have something they could use to help their father or mother, but say, This is Corban (which means, it belongs to God), they are excused from helping their father or mother.  In this way the teaching you pass on to others cancels out the word of God. And there are many other things like this that you do."

Many Roman Catholics tend to appeal to the Bible when it's convenient then they flip their stance to the Vatican Canon Laws whenever it's convenient.  What's even more ridiculous is that many of them end up telling born again that they reject God's Word to keep their tradition is that they're calling the kettle black.  It's very tempting to tell them, "Look who's talking!" because the more I read the Bible daily, the more I understand their traditions don't fit at all with the Bible when I take their claims into context which they don't.  One of the verses that some of them love to use is Mark 7:8-13.

They're chewing themselves because many of their traditions are not in accordance to the Word of God.  They have conveniently 2 Thessalonians 2:15 from the Good News Translation says, "So then our brothers and sisters, stand firm and hold on to those truths which we taught you both in our preaching and in our letter." to justify their addition of extrabiblical tradition.  What the Apostle Paul really said was that every tradition of the church must be weighted according to Scripture.  That's what Sola Scriptura is about.  It's not that the Bible is the only book we read but the Bible is the only standard we follow for right and wrong.

The following have been some of the traditions of the Born Again Christianity which Roman Catholics have considered "unscriptural":

Allowing people to eat meat during Fridays and Lenten season.  

They can go ahead and misquote Jesus' fasting to justify not eating meat.  Colossians 2:16-17 condemns them because it says you shouldn't judge anyone what they eat or drink for religious reasons.  What the passage is talking about is about that you may or may not abstain from meat during Lenten season or any holy day.   Of course, this doesn't mean to condone people not to listen to their doctor about avoiding certain foods for health reasons.  Like eating of dogs, cats or any rabies producing animals should definitely be a no-no because they can seriously harm your body with a lot of complications.  On the other hand, pork, certain fish without fins and scales, shrimp, prawn, lobster and any "unclean meat" that are fit for consumption can certainly be allowed.  Although, you might want to consider going under a Levitical diet for better health.

Baptism by immersion.  

Have they even understood the meaning of the Greek that baptizio means to immerse?  If they clearly read the Scriptures (which they don't) they should realize the formula of baptism was as Acts 2:41 says first you believe before you're baptized.  In Acts 8:38-39 we read that baptism happens by immersion.  The story of Philip and the Ethiopian eunuch really shows that they went to the water and the immersion happens.  They can laugh at baptisms at the river as if the Lord Jesus Christ whom they claim to serve wasn't baptized in the Jordan River.  Jesus' baptism was done by immersion.  Today, Christians don't necessarily have to baptize by the river since there are modern alternatives where immersion can be done.

Confessing one's sins directly to God.  

Matthew 16:19 and 18:18 to say that you need to confess your sins to the priest.  They're just really taking things out of context.  Matthew 16:19 is about the keys of the Gospel of the Kingdom and Matthew 18;18 is all about church discipline.  There's been no example in the Bible where confession of one's sins was ever done to the priests in the New Testament.  1 John 1:9 really says we need to confess our sins directly to God and not through anyone.

Lord's supper done with both bread and wine and in the evening.  

I really find it funny they say that you must eat Jesus' body and drink Jesus' blood by literal means as they misquote John 6 to do so.  What's really so funny is that the celebration of the Roman Catholic Mass goes beyond symbolism to the point of absurdity as a continuous sacrifice.  While Vatican Canon Law says that the sacrifice is continuous but Hebrews 10:12 declares it to be done.  The Lord's supper was set as a memorial for what's already been finished on the cross.  Roman Catholics don't even do the Lord's supper right.  Not only are the laity not drinking any of the wine which makes me ask them, "If you don't drink the wine then how can you drink Jesus' blood to obtain eternal life?" but they have also turned it from supper to breakfast and lunch if the Mass was celebrated during the morning or noon or snacks if it were celebrated in the afternoon.  The Bible commands in 1 Corinthians 11:26 that as often as you eat this bread and drink from this cup.  So if transubstantiation were a real doctrine then born again Christians are the ones getting eternal life by the ordinance of the Lord's Supper because they both have the bread and wine, while Catholics only get wine and only their priest will have the right to eternal life.

Pastors are required to be married.  

It's stupid how one can quote the Old Testament to fit in the miter for the bishops yet they ignore that the priests are meant to be married and two, the rule for priesthood was they should come from the Tribe of Levi.  Leviticus 21 also commands the priests to be married to virgins of their own tribe which is so against celibacy.  1 Timothy 3:1-7 commands the church leaders (And don't tell me that a priest is not a church leader?!) to be married, the husband of only one wife and to run one's house properly.  What they fail to consider is that 1 Corinthians 7:32-35 doesn't require priests to be celibate and that if you can't handle celibacy, get married.

Praying directly in the Name of Jesus.  

They always love to throw the argument that you must pass through Mary before you can get to Jesus.  They misquote John 4:1-12 without understanding the full context.  John 14:13-14 makes it clear that we pray in the name of Jesus.  After the Day of Pentecost, the Scripture remains silent of the rest of Mary's days before she inevitably died of a natural death.  While she's indeed important in the fulfillment of the prophecy fo Jesus as the Seed of the woman and the Seed of David but she never invited people to herself to come to Christ.  All she said in John 2:5 was that do whatever Jesus tells you.  Jesus never told people to give His earthly mother more honor that only God alone should get.  Mary deserves honor like every good Christian but praying to her or asking for her intercession in spiritual matters is not biblical at all.  It is both necromancy and idolatry.

Sola Scriptura or Bible alone as the basis for worship practices and tradition.  

They just love to say that Sola Scriptura is "self-refuting" in order to justify their own traditions.  They quote John 21:25 to say that the Bible isn't enough but you have to realize that the Bible doesn't record anything that wasn't important like Jesus' eating meals, going to school and just anything that you don't write down in your diary.  To quote Hebrews 5:12 is also very condemning considering that the teachers were meant to teach the Scriptures and not add to it.  Born again Christians believe in the importance of having teachers to guide in teaching the Bible as the only standard for Christian values.  Besides, since when did Roman Catholic Masses ever have a diligent expository of Scriptures?

It really show show ignorance goes down to yet another level.  It's very important to keep praying for these people that they may be opened to the truth.  Sad to say, many of them will choose to remain blinded in their traditions.  It's important to keep praying for them, repay evil with kindness and to do whatever it takes to win them to Jesus Christ.  Besides, if anybody claimed to be a "born again Christian" before and became a Roman Catholic, they never woke up to the truth.  They were never in the truth to start with (1 John 2:19).

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Ken Ham's Illustrations on Spiritual Warfare Against Humanism

Dr. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis made these beautiful illustrations to show what's wrong with the church today. Let's take a look at the two illustrations on how Christians engage their spiritual warfare. 
The first illustration reveals the following:
One member is asleep when he should be doing something.Another person is firing at the balloons because the person who's supposed to fire it is asleep on the job.Somebody is focused on deflecting cannon balls than hitting the source of the cannon balls.Somebody is treating the whole situation like a game.  
By doing so, humanism is victorious whenever the local church is asleep. This is the problem to why Christians tend to fall down in battle at times:
Ezekiel 22:30 And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before Me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none.
In short, if you're not going to stand in the gap on behalf of the land then who will? It's the…

The Ridiculous Roman Catholic View That Marriage Must Be Done Inside Their Church or It's Invalid

I remembered reading through the seven sacraments or ordinances of the Roman Catholic institution in a catechism. One of the teachings is that marriage must be treated as a sacrament. What it also implies is that if your marriage is done in a civil court that even if it was duly registered, that both couples were in a sexually pure union then it's not a marriage. So does that mean that a person can marry in a civil court, get divorced and marry his next spouse in the Roman Catholic institution?

Let's address the issue of civil marriage that is pure and holy. In short there was no incest, no adultery and it was between two people who are eligible for marriage. So why should the Roman Catholic institution even think that two people who got married with the sexually pure prerequisites in the eyes of God should be rejected. Is it because unless it's a priest who performs the marriage then the marriage can't be validated? It's a problem with how Roman Catholics have thei…

James 2 DOES NOT Teach Works Salvation

In a hasty attempt to defend works salvation, they would appeal to James 2.  It would be time to actually clear the fact that Paul and James DO NOT contradict each other. James 2 DOES NOT teach works salvation in which now can be clearly seen when this whole chapter is being dissected to show that James 2 does not defend the heretic crowd.  So let's try to check out what James 2 really is saying.
So first, it's time to think about these facts to debunk the heretical argument of using James 2:
1.) James 2:14-18 is not talking about works salvation but rather, again showing one's faith by one's works.  James 2:18 is a challenge to show one's faith.  Want to know about faith?  Hebrews 11 talks about the results of faith with some of the heroes of the Bible.  Try to coincide Hebrews 11 and James 2 and one sees the results of faith.  As said, when one says that a faith without works is DEAD because true faith produces good works to validate faith.  That's really th…

Don't Forget That the Roman Catholic Institution Has a Very Long History of Inciting Sedition

The Roman Catholic institution has its long fraudulent history of claiming to be the "One True Church that was founded n 33 A.D. - Holy, Catholic and Apostolic". The word catholic is a synonym for universal but the disciples were never first called Catholics in Antioch but Christians (Acts 11:26). Catholic was used as an old world for universal which some people today are allergic to that word because Catholic has been used to describe people who are members of the Roman Catholic institution. What can be talked about now is the fact that the Roman Catholic institution has had a long history of inciting sedition in governments. While they claim it to be doing the "work of God" or as the Jesuits say "Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam" or "For the greater glory of God." but is it really?

Doing some study of the history of the Vatican has it shown that the Inquisition and later the Jesuit Order have a lot of bloody rags to answer for. Did you know that many ki…

Does Salvation by Grace Through Faith in Jesus Christ Grant a License to Sin?

Here's a commonly heard argument saying, "Well salvation by faith alone in Jesus Christ is unjust and grants a license to sin." which is frequently done by most world religions.  They demand people must work for their salvation and for one, it's NOT even realistic or practical as it promotes the idea of a dictator God PLUS it's nothing more than asking for the impossible because God's standard of holiness is a LOT higher than all the good works man does.  Despite all the good man does, still they will fall into sin and the followers of almost every false religion this world has to offer shows that like how your average religious person attends religious services yet he/she falls into sin for the rest of the week, showing he/she is WEAK in the flesh.
Now it's time to really correct the whole erroneous argument as false.  Why?  The Bible says otherwise about what God's salvation by grace through faith really does- it transforms the individual to resist…

Testimony of Former Jesuit Priest Victor J. Affonso

To Follow Jesus Without Compromise by Victor J. Affonso
Why I joined the Society of Jesus
At the age of 23, I was a successful commercial artist on the verge of going abroad where a job was awaiting me. I was happy at the prospect of leaving India and thereby also escaping the terrible anguish caused of seeing the misery of the poor in the streets of Bombay.
Political saviors like Gandhi and Nehru had failed in giving true freedom and justice to India’s poor majority. Murder and divisions assailed “independent” India, and so it still is today. All the social works were but a few drops of water in a desert. Yet there was still one solution left: The words of Jesus kept coming to me during prayer, “…For with God ALL things are possible” (Mark 10:27). “Don’t run away!” On another day I heard the words, “Follow My Son — Jesus!” This word finally led me to leave the world and join the Society of Jesus, a missionary order that promised by its very title, its “Spiritual Exercises” and its C…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…