Skip to main content

Roman Catholic Apologists Are Just Chewing Themselves Whenever They Quote Mark 7:8-13 Against Born Again Christians

It's very amazing to how Roman Catholic apologists can really chew themselves out whenever they misquote the Bible.  That is why it's important for every serious born again Christian apologist to use exegesis or learning more about Scripture in context lest they go ranting "to him that pisseth against the wall" out of context.

Let's read Mark 7:8-13 from the Good News Translation which is commonly used by Roman Catholics saying:
"You put aside God's command and obey human teachings.  And Jesus continued, You have a clever way of rejecting God's law in order to uphold your own teaching.  For Moses commanded, Respect your father and your mother, and, If you curse your father or your mother, you are to be put to death.  But you teach that if people have something they could use to help their father or mother, but say, This is Corban (which means, it belongs to God), they are excused from helping their father or mother.  In this way the teaching you pass on to others cancels out the word of God. And there are many other things like this that you do."

Many Roman Catholics tend to appeal to the Bible when it's convenient then they flip their stance to the Vatican Canon Laws whenever it's convenient.  What's even more ridiculous is that many of them end up telling born again that they reject God's Word to keep their tradition is that they're calling the kettle black.  It's very tempting to tell them, "Look who's talking!" because the more I read the Bible daily, the more I understand their traditions don't fit at all with the Bible when I take their claims into context which they don't.  One of the verses that some of them love to use is Mark 7:8-13.

They're chewing themselves because many of their traditions are not in accordance to the Word of God.  They have conveniently 2 Thessalonians 2:15 from the Good News Translation says, "So then our brothers and sisters, stand firm and hold on to those truths which we taught you both in our preaching and in our letter." to justify their addition of extrabiblical tradition.  What the Apostle Paul really said was that every tradition of the church must be weighted according to Scripture.  That's what Sola Scriptura is about.  It's not that the Bible is the only book we read but the Bible is the only standard we follow for right and wrong.

The following have been some of the traditions of the Born Again Christianity which Roman Catholics have considered "unscriptural":

Allowing people to eat meat during Fridays and Lenten season.  

They can go ahead and misquote Jesus' fasting to justify not eating meat.  Colossians 2:16-17 condemns them because it says you shouldn't judge anyone what they eat or drink for religious reasons.  What the passage is talking about is about that you may or may not abstain from meat during Lenten season or any holy day.   Of course, this doesn't mean to condone people not to listen to their doctor about avoiding certain foods for health reasons.  Like eating of dogs, cats or any rabies producing animals should definitely be a no-no because they can seriously harm your body with a lot of complications.  On the other hand, pork, certain fish without fins and scales, shrimp, prawn, lobster and any "unclean meat" that are fit for consumption can certainly be allowed.  Although, you might want to consider going under a Levitical diet for better health.

Baptism by immersion.  

Have they even understood the meaning of the Greek that baptizio means to immerse?  If they clearly read the Scriptures (which they don't) they should realize the formula of baptism was as Acts 2:41 says first you believe before you're baptized.  In Acts 8:38-39 we read that baptism happens by immersion.  The story of Philip and the Ethiopian eunuch really shows that they went to the water and the immersion happens.  They can laugh at baptisms at the river as if the Lord Jesus Christ whom they claim to serve wasn't baptized in the Jordan River.  Jesus' baptism was done by immersion.  Today, Christians don't necessarily have to baptize by the river since there are modern alternatives where immersion can be done.

Confessing one's sins directly to God.  

Matthew 16:19 and 18:18 to say that you need to confess your sins to the priest.  They're just really taking things out of context.  Matthew 16:19 is about the keys of the Gospel of the Kingdom and Matthew 18;18 is all about church discipline.  There's been no example in the Bible where confession of one's sins was ever done to the priests in the New Testament.  1 John 1:9 really says we need to confess our sins directly to God and not through anyone.

Lord's supper done with both bread and wine and in the evening.  

I really find it funny they say that you must eat Jesus' body and drink Jesus' blood by literal means as they misquote John 6 to do so.  What's really so funny is that the celebration of the Roman Catholic Mass goes beyond symbolism to the point of absurdity as a continuous sacrifice.  While Vatican Canon Law says that the sacrifice is continuous but Hebrews 10:12 declares it to be done.  The Lord's supper was set as a memorial for what's already been finished on the cross.  Roman Catholics don't even do the Lord's supper right.  Not only are the laity not drinking any of the wine which makes me ask them, "If you don't drink the wine then how can you drink Jesus' blood to obtain eternal life?" but they have also turned it from supper to breakfast and lunch if the Mass was celebrated during the morning or noon or snacks if it were celebrated in the afternoon.  The Bible commands in 1 Corinthians 11:26 that as often as you eat this bread and drink from this cup.  So if transubstantiation were a real doctrine then born again Christians are the ones getting eternal life by the ordinance of the Lord's Supper because they both have the bread and wine, while Catholics only get wine and only their priest will have the right to eternal life.

Pastors are required to be married.  

It's stupid how one can quote the Old Testament to fit in the miter for the bishops yet they ignore that the priests are meant to be married and two, the rule for priesthood was they should come from the Tribe of Levi.  Leviticus 21 also commands the priests to be married to virgins of their own tribe which is so against celibacy.  1 Timothy 3:1-7 commands the church leaders (And don't tell me that a priest is not a church leader?!) to be married, the husband of only one wife and to run one's house properly.  What they fail to consider is that 1 Corinthians 7:32-35 doesn't require priests to be celibate and that if you can't handle celibacy, get married.

Praying directly in the Name of Jesus.  

They always love to throw the argument that you must pass through Mary before you can get to Jesus.  They misquote John 4:1-12 without understanding the full context.  John 14:13-14 makes it clear that we pray in the name of Jesus.  After the Day of Pentecost, the Scripture remains silent of the rest of Mary's days before she inevitably died of a natural death.  While she's indeed important in the fulfillment of the prophecy fo Jesus as the Seed of the woman and the Seed of David but she never invited people to herself to come to Christ.  All she said in John 2:5 was that do whatever Jesus tells you.  Jesus never told people to give His earthly mother more honor that only God alone should get.  Mary deserves honor like every good Christian but praying to her or asking for her intercession in spiritual matters is not biblical at all.  It is both necromancy and idolatry.

Sola Scriptura or Bible alone as the basis for worship practices and tradition.  

They just love to say that Sola Scriptura is "self-refuting" in order to justify their own traditions.  They quote John 21:25 to say that the Bible isn't enough but you have to realize that the Bible doesn't record anything that wasn't important like Jesus' eating meals, going to school and just anything that you don't write down in your diary.  To quote Hebrews 5:12 is also very condemning considering that the teachers were meant to teach the Scriptures and not add to it.  Born again Christians believe in the importance of having teachers to guide in teaching the Bible as the only standard for Christian values.  Besides, since when did Roman Catholic Masses ever have a diligent expository of Scriptures?

It really show show ignorance goes down to yet another level.  It's very important to keep praying for these people that they may be opened to the truth.  Sad to say, many of them will choose to remain blinded in their traditions.  It's important to keep praying for them, repay evil with kindness and to do whatever it takes to win them to Jesus Christ.  Besides, if anybody claimed to be a "born again Christian" before and became a Roman Catholic, they never woke up to the truth.  They were never in the truth to start with (1 John 2:19).

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Hebrews 6:4-6 Explained

Hebrews 6:4-6 says, "For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, and have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, if they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame."
This verse is another that is being used by the works salvation crowd as a means to prove again that salvation can be lost.  However what does this mean?  This again shows the fact that once a Christian, always a Christian and that means, you cannot lose your salvation.  So notice the words "IF they fall away" but as said, Christians DO NOT fall away from the faith even if they fall into sin because they are still sinners (1 John 1:8, 1 John 2:1) but they have power over sin because of the Lord Jesus Christ's grace in their lives (Titus 2:11-15).  As said, Christians are now partakers…

What's Wrong with the Ang Dating Daan Movement?

The Ang Dating Daan movement is by the Members Church of God International spearheaded by its pastor (and so-called "prophet") Eliseo Soriano.  While claiming to be an expositor of the Scriptures with his "Itanong Mo Kay Soriano" or "Ask Soriano" In English, this religious group actually isn't Christian as some of the ignorant would want to believe.  Though the group claims the Bible is their only authority (as some cults do) but the problem is that they believe only Eli Soriano may interpret the Scriptures.  This is utter heresy!  Not even a great man in the Scriptures, Charles Spurgeon ever made such a preposterous claim!  This is no better than the "true church" movement by Darwin Fish which is exposed by Pastor Phil Johnson as a heretical movement.  In fact, I'm not going to waste my time debating with ADD members, they are a total waste of my time as every other debate.
Unlike John F. Macarthur of Grace to You that actually encoura…

Misunderstanding "Turn the Other Cheek" Can Be Life Threatening

One of the biggest misconceptions is the statement of "turn the other cheek"? Does that mean that Christians are taught not to sue anyone and not to do self-defense? It's best to understand what turn the other cheek in Matthew 5:39 means.

So what does a slap in the face mean? A slap isn't always a literal slap. It should be known that a slap may also mean an insult or name-calling. The Jewish culture in Jesus' day had already misused and abused the eye for eye and tooth for tooth rule in Exodus 21:24. Instead of using it as a standard for punishing offenses, they have misused it in order to pursue personal revenge or think that God allows personal revenge. They took the whole verse out of context ignoring verses in the Old Testament that clearly forbade revenge. Did they even read Deuteronomy 32:39 that says that revenge is not ours but God's? It's probable that their culture that day that even a mere insult already warranted someone the right to hit the…

Honoring Martin Luther King Jr. as a Hero Continues the Counter-Reformation

The celebration of the 500 years of the Reformation last October 31, 2017 doesn't mean that the Vatican won't continue to celebrate the Counter-Reformation. The Counter-Reformation celebrated its 470th year last December 13, 2015 since it started last December 13, 1545. It was Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday day yesterday. Celebrating his day should never be associated with born again Christians regardless of denomination. Whether they're Baptist or Protestant, it's an insult to blend in with the celebration of Dr. King's birthday. If Martin Luther started the Reformation then Martin Luther King Jr. was certainly a tool for continuing the Counter-Reformation.

If a Baptist pastor or a Protestant pastor gets honors and recognition from the Vatican, or is openly working with them -- then that's a time to sound the red alarm that a wolf in sheep's clothing is around. How can any Baptist or Protestant pastor even think for a second that the Reformation…

Professional Christian Apologists Should Avoid Having Formal Discussions With Amateur (or Self-Proclaimed) Catholic Apologists

I remembered watching a couple of old discussions conducted by professional Roman Catholic apologists such as Mitch Pacwa SJ and Dr. Taylor Marshall (the owner of the video above). I have seen through the debates between Evangelical vs. Roman Catholic in the John Ankerburg show or those conducted by Dr. James R. White of the Alpha and Omega Ministries (AOM). But there's a specific group of people that should be brought up namely amateur (or self-proclaimed)Catholic apologists. 
What's with dealing with amateur or self-proclaimed Catholic apologists? Unlike their fellow Roman Catholic apologists that I have mentioned or others who have had a formal debate with Dr. White, these people are merely self-proclaimed. You can check their background and you may find that they don't have any real training in how to be an effective apologist. They may have simply made themselves as apologists without any real training.

You can observe the big difference between the self-proclaimed C…

Warning: Unsaved Pastors Are Seeking to Destroy the Flock

Whether you believe it or not unsaved pastors do exist. They are pastors in name only but not pastors whom God has appointed in Ephesians 4:11 and Jeremiah 3:15. Anybody can be a pastor but not anybody is truly a man of God. The book of Jeremiah is so full of condemnation of wicked pastors (shepherds) and priests who were not men of God. Jeremiah 5:31 has the priests getting popularity as they bear rule by their means. Today, you've got pastors becoming popular as they run things not the biblical way but their own twisted way. It bothers me to think how some quack pastors are  They are the erring pastors in Jeremiah. In the Old Testament, they are comparable to the priests who have erred in so much error. It's just like how the sons of Eli were indeed priests in the Old Testament but the sons of Satan who is also called Belial in the Old Testament (1 Samuel 2:12).

2 Timothy 4:3-5 warns that the last days will be full of false teachers. These are pastors who don't teach the…

The Horrors of the Horrid Family: The Herods and Inbreeding

So here is the family tree of the Herods which I would say is not a happy family.  One can think about the incest and intrigue of this family or the whispers of the world "incestuous" about them considering these events that had transpired in the family tree to the point it's best to call them the Horrids or the Horrors whatever name will fit them better:
1.) Herodias (or Horridias as I want to call her) is the daughter of Aristobulus a much older son of Herod the Great by Mariamne I was married to her half-uncle, Herod Philip I and had a freak daughter named Salome.  Salome wouldn't be a normal child either considering she was born of incest between half-uncle and half-niece.  So she was both granddaughter and great-granddaughter to the wicked Herod the Great.  I guess Salome was a retard too though she did live long enough.  Note also that Herodias was the sister of Herod Agrippa I who was later eaten of worms as the throne was later lost out of her greed.  Also H…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

Paul Washer's Quote to Slam the Prosperity Gospel

I really am so annoyed with all the prosperity gospel garbage because it is not biblical doctrine.  When I became a Christian, it is not about what it has done for me but what I have done for God.  If I am going to follow Christ, I can only expect to be ridiculed and persecuted.  If I am going to follow Christ then I expect the whole world to leave me behind.  Why do I expect that?  John 15:18-19 warns that the Christians are not of the world.  James 4:4 warns that you cannot be a friend of both the world and of God.

It is utterly foolish to say, "Receive Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior and you will get healing and prosperity.  You will get a Mercedes Benz."  The more I read through the words of Jesus, the more I realize He did not promise any of those garbage that the prosperity crowd promises.  Instead, I read more warnings about persecution for His Name's sake.  Being a Christian can also mean being unpopular, hated, rejected, a laughingstock for the wrong reas…

Do You Give Your Tithes and Offerings from a Loving Heart?

It's time to talk about the topic of giving. This would be a very touchy topic because man is inherently selfish after the fall. I remembered reading across the rules on offerings and one verse struck me the most. I remembered what Malachi 3:10-11 says that people can rob God in tithes and offerings. The tithes and offerings were used to support the Levites' work. Anyone who says tithes are unbiblical need to reread that verse.

Tithing has been silent in the New Testament. I haven't read much about tithing being emphasized. Instead, we have the emphasis of the cheerful giver (2 Corinthians 9:7). It's amazing how some pseudo-Christian sects and some churches that's supposedly Christian (ex. some Baptist and Evangelical churches) have even gone as far as to monitor and chase their members for not tithing. While I do still believe in tithing is necessary to help maintain the local churches but no church should coerce the tithes out of their members.

Do you know that w…