Atheism Commits Guilt By Association, Genetic Fallacy and Ad Hominem Against Christians!

I really can't help but feel sorry for atheistic reasoning because they are blinded by their own arrogance.  I know it does get on my nerves but there's no use arguing with them because they drag people down to their level and beat them with their experience.  Looking at how they look at Christians, they consider them as too retarded even for the simplest task of boiling water or if Christians are for it, they must go against it  Doesn't that sound like guilt by association, genetic fallacy and Ad Hominem arguments?

Guilt by association means you immediately assume an action is wrong based on the actions of another.  Atheists think that anything Christians do is wrong.  If it's a Christian they'll say that such people are retarded and liars (even if they believe that sin is just a fantasy word).  They choose to reject anything written by a Christian simply because it was written by a Christian.  It made me think if Christians do scientific studies then they should get rid of it as well.

Genetic fallacy is when you choose to reject something because of the source rather than analyzing the context.  I have noticed how some people may even reject quotes based on the source rather than the validity.  For the atheist, the source matters more than the context.  Anything for them that comes from a Christian is deemed to be retarded or stupid.  They should really stop studying Newtonian physics and benefiting from products of Creation Science.

Lastly we have the Ad Hominem where they choose to attack the person instead of the argument.  Atheists have often done that attack to Christians like,  "You are not even a biologist to speak that evolution isn't real." even if the Christian has quoted from valid sources like a biologist who shows evidence for evolution.  This of course can be used against them if the proponent of atheistic evolution may not be a graduate of any biology related course.


See also: