Skip to main content

The Sin of Asking God to Bless Politically Correct People

It's annoying how one can see in social media platforms people who are asking God to bless certain politically correct people. I'm not surprised at how many of these people are Roman Catholics, pseudo-Evangelicals that belong to so-called Christian assembles (but are actually ecumenically yoked and/or teaching the prosperity "gospel"), religious sexual deviants (such as homosexuals who are religious Roman Catholics or belong to pro-homosexual churches) and other religious but lost people who want to propagate political correctness. The amount of filth made by these people is so overwhelming I can't help but vomit at people who ask God to bless politically correct people. 
Isaiah 5:20 
Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

God warns about calling evil as good and good as evil. The politically correct standard today has done that. We have pseudo-intellectuals who use the statement "study shows" to justify their sinful agenda. They have a lot of falsified data which dupes the gullible public into accepting sin into their lives. Some pseudo-intellectuals have lied that homosexual activities "harms no one" caused homosexual "marriage" to be legalized in several countries. We have more and more pseudo-intellectuals spreading the harmful lie that the use of crystal meth and other dangerous drugs doesn't harm the brain even when evidence says otherwise. Some people even think that the only way to stop prostitution is to legalize it. In short, they are telling the world that the only way to stop sin is to legalize it. That's one of the stupidest ideas that any Christian would reject as the Bible is a book that clearly prohibits sin and promotes righteousness.

The idea of stopping sin by legalizing is really stupid. God didn't seek to throw away sin in the camp by legalizing it. Instead, He ordered stoning people who broke His law to protect the camp and to discourage sin. Do these politically correct people think that God Himself will bless people who advocate the very sins He goes against? Do you know why God ordered the destruction of whole civilizations? It's because these cities were sin cities. Canaan for one was a city where several sins were legal. A lot of civilizations fell because of their legalization of sins like bestiality, incest, homosexuality and prostitution. Sodom and Gomorrah got wiped out because those were two cities that legalized sin. If you legalize then then it will get worse. I don't care if the government taxes prostitution and narcotics but it still promotes it. If both sins were made legal they will get worse because people have more access to it. But if it were discouraged they would be greatly reduced in numbers. Too many people today would do anything to get certain sins legalized and that's no surprise. Satan has blinded their minds without them knowing it.

I wonder how do these people who ask God to bless politically correct people think of God? They have a wrong view of God. They may think God is all love and He winks at their sins. If that's their view of God then that's not the God of the Bible. God is love but He is also holy and just. He will not let sin go unpunished. God in the Old Testament was not a murderous monster. Every act He committed to destroy sinful mankind was because their time is up. God sent His only Son the Lord Jesus Christ to die for sins so people can be free of them. God's order to destroy sinful civilizations is fair and just. It's not at all "unfair" because these sinful civilizations were a danger to other people around them. Would you forfeit the right of a nation to defend itself in times of war? Would you rather let a person get raped rather than give that person the right to self-defense?

Calling themselves liberal is also not according to the Bible. Do they want to know what the Bible says about them? The Bible doesn't call them liberal at all.
Isaiah 32:4-6 
The heart also of the rash shall understand knowledge, and the tongue of the stammerers shall be ready to speak plainly. The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful. For the vile person will speak villany, and his heart will work iniquity, to practise hypocrisy, and to utter error against the LORD, to make empty the soul of the hungry, and he will cause the drink of the thirsty to fail.

To be liberal means to be generous towards others. Coining the word liberal to the vile is man's way of calling good as evil and evil as good. The Bible's definition of the liberal is not the same as the political correctness' definition of the liberal. The idea of liberalism or being a political liberal is a perversion of the word liberal. It's just like how gay used to describe a person who is happy but now it's used to describe a male homosexual. The politically correct even redefines love as tolerance of error and sin. It's sickening how sinful man has caused meanings of certain words to have new definitions to suit their needs.

Just because this article is not politically correct doesn't mean Christians should go out there and quarrel politically correct people. Instead, it's all about speaking the truth in love (Ephesians 4:15) even if Christians are told to confront evildoers (Ephesians 5:11). Politically correct people need to be lovingly confronted about the truth of God's holiness, that sin is sin and that Christians love them enough to tell them the whole truth. These people are not the enemy. Satan and his demons are the enemies who control them. They are the mission field that hast to be reached out with love even if they hate us. It's all about loving the hateful, being kind to the unkind and showing Christian holiness to unholy people.

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Ken Ham's Illustrations on Spiritual Warfare Against Humanism

Dr. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis made these beautiful illustrations to show what's wrong with the church today. Let's take a look at the two illustrations on how Christians engage their spiritual warfare. 
The first illustration reveals the following:
One member is asleep when he should be doing something.Another person is firing at the balloons because the person who's supposed to fire it is asleep on the job.Somebody is focused on deflecting cannon balls than hitting the source of the cannon balls.Somebody is treating the whole situation like a game.  
By doing so, humanism is victorious whenever the local church is asleep. This is the problem to why Christians tend to fall down in battle at times:
Ezekiel 22:30 And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before Me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none.
In short, if you're not going to stand in the gap on behalf of the land then who will? It's the…

The Ridiculous Roman Catholic View That Marriage Must Be Done Inside Their Church or It's Invalid

I remembered reading through the seven sacraments or ordinances of the Roman Catholic institution in a catechism. One of the teachings is that marriage must be treated as a sacrament. What it also implies is that if your marriage is done in a civil court that even if it was duly registered, that both couples were in a sexually pure union then it's not a marriage. So does that mean that a person can marry in a civil court, get divorced and marry his next spouse in the Roman Catholic institution?

Let's address the issue of civil marriage that is pure and holy. In short there was no incest, no adultery and it was between two people who are eligible for marriage. So why should the Roman Catholic institution even think that two people who got married with the sexually pure prerequisites in the eyes of God should be rejected. Is it because unless it's a priest who performs the marriage then the marriage can't be validated? It's a problem with how Roman Catholics have thei…

Don't Forget That the Roman Catholic Institution Has a Very Long History of Inciting Sedition

The Roman Catholic institution has its long fraudulent history of claiming to be the "One True Church that was founded n 33 A.D. - Holy, Catholic and Apostolic". The word catholic is a synonym for universal but the disciples were never first called Catholics in Antioch but Christians (Acts 11:26). Catholic was used as an old world for universal which some people today are allergic to that word because Catholic has been used to describe people who are members of the Roman Catholic institution. What can be talked about now is the fact that the Roman Catholic institution has had a long history of inciting sedition in governments. While they claim it to be doing the "work of God" or as the Jesuits say "Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam" or "For the greater glory of God." but is it really?

Doing some study of the history of the Vatican has it shown that the Inquisition and later the Jesuit Order have a lot of bloody rags to answer for. Did you know that many ki…

Testimony of Former Jesuit Priest Victor J. Affonso

To Follow Jesus Without Compromise by Victor J. Affonso
Why I joined the Society of Jesus
At the age of 23, I was a successful commercial artist on the verge of going abroad where a job was awaiting me. I was happy at the prospect of leaving India and thereby also escaping the terrible anguish caused of seeing the misery of the poor in the streets of Bombay.
Political saviors like Gandhi and Nehru had failed in giving true freedom and justice to India’s poor majority. Murder and divisions assailed “independent” India, and so it still is today. All the social works were but a few drops of water in a desert. Yet there was still one solution left: The words of Jesus kept coming to me during prayer, “…For with God ALL things are possible” (Mark 10:27). “Don’t run away!” On another day I heard the words, “Follow My Son — Jesus!” This word finally led me to leave the world and join the Society of Jesus, a missionary order that promised by its very title, its “Spiritual Exercises” and its C…

Understanding Ignatius of Antioch's Statement on the Eucharist

It's already expected that Roman Catholicism takes Scriptures out of context and/or purposely misreads it. If they can't even handle the Word of God with reverence then I don't expect them to handle anything else with reverence except it be the writing of the past Popes and the Roman Catholic priests. One such man is the Christian bishop or overseer. In case Roman Catholics want to argue that the term "bishop" would prove he's one of their kind then they are mistaken. To be a bishop according to 1 Timothy 3:1-7 is to be a church leader. Besides, the same passage says that bishops must be family men of moral dignity which is impossible for a Roman Catholic priest who's bound to celibacy. Please note 1 Corinthians 7:35-37 is not a command for priests to stay single all their lives!
Now here's a popular misquote from the very passage of Ignatius of Antioch to justify the doctrine of transubstantiation: They abstain from the eucharist and from prayer, bec…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

God's Curse Upon Gambling!

One of the greatest hypocrisies that people are facing right now is the sin of legalized gambling. Why do I dare say it is hypocritical? It's because for one legalized gambling promotes all type of filth. We have laws against adultery but not against pornography, we have laws against stealing but not against gambling which is really a sin. Today, Christians must voice out not only against legalized prostitution and legalized pornography, they must also voice against legalized gambling. 1 Timothy 6:10 is true that in these days, the love for money is the root of all evil in the secular world plus gambling is mainly rooted upon the love for money. We ought to think that in every way, money is not evil but the love for it is really evil. Gambling in itself is fed because of the love of money. Pastor Mike Stahl a Baptist preacher had also revealed the ill effects of gambling, in truth it is a very lucrative business that sadly destroys lives. To be honest, gambling has been one of th…