Skip to main content

Be Careful of Pseudo-Knowledge Promoted by Intellectually Dishonest People

The Apostle Paul wrote to Timothy giving this warning about intellectual dishonesty:
1 Timothy 6:20 
O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:

This is the problem in the world of apologetics today. It's very easy to get mislead by a lot of science falsely so-called. This is all about pseudo-knowledge and dangerous it is to people. Here are a few of the many phrases that can be misused and abused by pseudo-intellectuals tend to use or love to use to spread their lies:
  • I'm sure... (insert half-truth/s)
  • Studies show that... (insert half-truth/s)
  • There is overwhelming evidence/no evidence... (insert half-truth/s)
  • Study history... (insert half-truth/s)
  • It wasn't until (insert time period) that the doctrine of (insert doctrine) was developed
  • Everybody knows that... (insert half-truth/s)

Which in turn, one can see how these pseudo-intellectuals tend to be contradictory or self-defeating:
  • Some people who say they're not sure are also the same people who declare that there are no moral absolutes. If there are no moral absolutes then how can one be sure?
  • It's highly possible that the studies that are used to back up pseudo-intellectual arguments are also based on faulty studies and not reliable ones. They would accuse the other party of being close-minded while they are close-minded themselves. They would only get anything to support their faulty data.
    • The anti-death penalty crowd is fond of using faulty data to prove that death penalty doesn't solve any crime from countries where law enforcement is almost non-existent.
    • Atheistic evolutionists would use various sources of fabricated data to "prove" that creationism is a "hoax" and evolution is a "fact".
  • The argument of overwhelming evidence or no evidence can also fall flat with the following:
    • A good example would be the theory of atheistic evolution. The so-called "overwhelming" evidence is based on the fossil record which defends creationism and Intelligent Design. 
    • Another good example would be that saying that atheists tend to say that there's no evidence for God therefore He doesn't exist. What they fail to see is that the evidence is actually overwhelming in nature with how organized nature is to be an accident. 
    • It's highly possible to make one look so credible through falsified data to "create" the "overwhelming evidence" and hide the actual data to make it look like that there's "no evidence".
  • When certain groups tell us to study history they may be asking us to study revisionism instead of the actual facts. There's a statement that "history is written by the victors". What's become so irritating to think about is that some history books tend to deny some facts. Some secular sources can be as dishonest as to declare some of these lies and how they are spread:
    • The different dinosaur periods which don't event exist or that the Earth is billions of years old when it isn't.
    • Some sources name Peter the first Pope even when that's historically impossible. I get told to read the encyclopedia as information to get Peter is the Pope. Hmmm... I could remember believing that Santa Claus was real because a children's book told me he was real. 
    • A lot of important facts like creationist scientists are being deleted. Some famous figures who are not atheists are labeled to be atheists to promote the atheist movement.
  • The argument of "it wasn't until this time period" is usually unsubstantiated. I could remember how I got into an argument with a member of the INC who said that it wasn't until the 14th century that the doctrine of the Trinity was invented. Where in the world did he get that infomation?
  • Arguing that "everybody knows" is an obvious exaggeration to outnumber someone. It's like when someone says "Everybody knows Santa Claus doesn't exist." but how many do believe that the fictitious character is real? This would require confirmation from everyone on Earth before this statement can even be validated. 

These pseudo-intellectuals can also call those who disagree with them as stupid and intellectually dishonest. It's safe to believe that these pseudo-intellectuals know that they are spreading a lie but they do it for their own convenience. Some of these pseudo-intellectuals are highly educated people like lawyers and doctors. Some claim they have the credentials which they don't even have because it was gotten through dishonest gain. Some may have a lot of knowledge but are willing to spread dishonest lies to make money out of gullible people or because they get paid by someone to make a lie look like it's real. Having a high standard of education is useless if you're intellectually dishonest.

Considering the amount of intellectual dishonestly these people hold then it shouldn't be surprising with how they spread their lies. There's a high chance that such people would resolve to Ad Hominem attacks, argument from silence, non sequitur, poisoning the well, special pleading and straw man arguments. If they can't win a fair fight then getting low and dirty has always been used to carry out their quest to spread intellectual dishonesty. They instead choose to concentrate on their opponent than what their opponent is saying. It's like a dishonest doctor who's silencing a non-doctor who is telling the plain truth about the former's lies. An example might be that the same dishonest doctor is telling people to inhale methamphetamine to heal themselves. He also says that the other person has no qualification to say it because the latter is not a doctor.

There's one established fact about the truth. A lie usually travels a mile or two before the truth will be revealed. Lies spread like wildfire because people lack discernment and knowledge. It's no wonder Hosea 4:6 warns that people are destroyed by a lack of knowledge. There are many scientific hoaxes today labeled as science. There are many revisionist lies today believed to be historical truth. Worse, these people can label anyone who disagrees with their lies guilty of exactly what they're doing. The fiery darts of the evil one are continuously fired every second. Who knows how many lies are presented as truth as this paragraph was being composed. After all, didn't Adolf Hitler also say this statement, "If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed."

But there's one comforting truth. The truth never changes into a lie even if the lie is more believed. Nobody can vote away the truth just because only a few believe it. A popular lie will always remain a popular lie even if almost everybody believes it. There will be a day of reckoning. Evil may prosper now but it will soon end in ruins later.

 See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Continue the Reformation Through Expository Preaching

It's not merely enough to protest against Rome. There are many who protest against Rome who are just as heretical as Rome. What's not too surprising is to find some "Baptist" preachers who reject the badly needed art of expository preaching. Why do we need expository preaching? To know why we need it we must first define it.

Defining expository preaching

This is what the book "By the Book: The Whys and Hows of Biblical Preaching" would define expository preaching:
Expository preaching. When the main theme, its main points and further development of the points of the points or sub-points are all derived from the content, context and structural flow of a longer text in Scripture. This is popular when expounding paragraphs, stanzas, and chapters of a book and especially when doing a series of preaching from a book. (p. 45)
Here is the definition from Got Questions on "What is expository preaching?":
Expository preaching involves the exposition, or co…

Continuing the Reformation Also Means Preaching Against Quack Evangelical Pastors

It's so easy to heckle on Roman Catholic priests and similar cultists but hard to acknowledge that Evangelical circles aren't free of wolves in sheep's clothing. What I thought about is how often you may think that a certain pastor is a man of God but he's just as much as a wolf in sheep's clothing as the Roman Catholic priests. Just because a person claims to be a pastor doesn't mean he's a man of God.

Should it be mentioned Jeremiah has condemned irresponsible pastors or shepherds with how they carry their jobs? Read them at Jeremiah 10:21, 12:10, 22:2, 23:1-2 and you'll find out the kind of pastors God hates. Jeremiah 3:15 has God promising to give pastors who will give understanding. The problem is that there are so many pastors who aren't even men of God. They are pastors by profession but they are not pastors in God's eyes. This is a warning to Christians that just because a pastor by profession doesn't mean the person is a man of God.…

The Difference Between Faith Results to Good Works vs. Adding Faith to Good Works

There's a huge argument between the Papists and the Reformers about what authentic faith is. The stand isn't just merely between Papists and the Reformers as it goes as far as Papists, anti-Catholic cults and the true born again Christians (Protestant or not) on what James means by faith without works is dead.

Is James saying that in order to get saved or to stay saved that you must add faith to good works?

Perhaps one reason why Martin Luther once thought of the Book of James as an epistle of straw was because it felt like the author added good works to saving faith. I remembered having a dialogue with a third degree cousin of mine who was a Roman Catholic apologist. He knew I was a former Catholic turned Baptist. I had a conversation with him and he told me that I should examine the Book of James to see good works are required for justification.

The Roman Catholic view as well as the anti-Catholic cultist view tends to use James' writing to justify their heresy. Here'…

What's Wrong with the Ang Dating Daan Movement?

The Ang Dating Daan movement is by the Members Church of God International spearheaded by its pastor (and so-called "prophet") Eliseo Soriano.  While claiming to be an expositor of the Scriptures with his "Itanong Mo Kay Soriano" or "Ask Soriano" In English, this religious group actually isn't Christian as some of the ignorant would want to believe.  Though the group claims the Bible is their only authority (as some cults do) but the problem is that they believe only Eli Soriano may interpret the Scriptures.  This is utter heresy!  Not even a great man in the Scriptures, Charles Spurgeon ever made such a preposterous claim!  This is no better than the "true church" movement by Darwin Fish which is exposed by Pastor Phil Johnson as a heretical movement.  In fact, I'm not going to waste my time debating with ADD members, they are a total waste of my time as every other debate.
Unlike John F. Macarthur of Grace to You that actually encoura…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

Testimony of Former Iglesia Ni Cristo Member, Now a Born Again Christian

Editor's note: 
First and foremost, I would like to thank the Bereans for this wonderful story of a former Iglesia ni Cristo minister (or pastor), now he has become a Baptist Christian.  It's a sad story that some people have just jumped from one cult to another.  Some members of the Watchtower Society, Charismatic Movement or the Iglesia ni Cristo have left Roman Catholicism but they have never truly come to know the truth of salvation is by faith in Christ alone and that any good works after Christian life is but the grace of God at work in the believer.  Now for this brave testimony that I can really share after many years of searching for one testimony which I hope will further bring more INC members to Jesus Christ.

May I begin with a word of prayer that in the midst of all these trouble, I call upon Jesus Christ the Son of God who the Iglesia ni Cristo deny is indeed God, the only way to salvation, that they trust upon their works and church membership than Him alone.  I…

Paul Washer's Quote to Slam the Prosperity Gospel

I really am so annoyed with all the prosperity gospel garbage because it is not biblical doctrine.  When I became a Christian, it is not about what it has done for me but what I have done for God.  If I am going to follow Christ, I can only expect to be ridiculed and persecuted.  If I am going to follow Christ then I expect the whole world to leave me behind.  Why do I expect that?  John 15:18-19 warns that the Christians are not of the world.  James 4:4 warns that you cannot be a friend of both the world and of God.

It is utterly foolish to say, "Receive Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior and you will get healing and prosperity.  You will get a Mercedes Benz."  The more I read through the words of Jesus, the more I realize He did not promise any of those garbage that the prosperity crowd promises.  Instead, I read more warnings about persecution for His Name's sake.  Being a Christian can also mean being unpopular, hated, rejected, a laughingstock for the wrong reas…