Skip to main content

Roman Catholic Mass Media's Selective Outrage

The Roman Catholic institution is either full of surprises or not full of it. I wouldn't know too much of any deep dark secrets of the Vatican nor do I intend to reveal them all. One of the biggest hypocrisies of the Vatican is their selective outrage. It's already an old issue but it still annoys me to death. It should be very frustrating even if it's not surprising. The Vatican has always been a beautifully white-washed tomb full of dead mean's bones. Many of these parishes are white-washed tombs both figuratively and literally. The Vatican has lot of crimes to answer for. One day, she's going to get what's coming for her.

A good example that I could cite is Archbishop Socrates Villegas of the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines. It's time to ask the question where was he in several cases where a Walk For Life was really needed. Instead of having a real walk for life during real times of crisis why is he instead proposing a Walk For Life for the likes of corrupt politicians like Senator like Leila De Lima or for big drug dealers instead of the victims of crime? While Christians should love even the most horrible of sinners but they are called to reprove evil and not to have fellowship with it (Ephesians 4:11). The problem is how misplaced the priorities of Catholic media can get. Why wasn't there any Walk For Life for the victims of Typhoon Yolanda or as of late, the victims of the Maute family terrorists done by Islamic terrorists? Are they angry at the Maute Islamic terrorists for their crimes or for attacking Roman Catholic parishes in Marawi? Why are they mad at death penalty? It's probably because a lot of people who are going to get the death penalty are devoted Roman Catholics who donate huge sums of money to the "Holy Mother Church".

The pattern has been the same. I could remember how often this goes. Whenever a Roman Catholic priest does anything shameful such as raping altar boys or women - they try to cover it as much as possible. Whenever a pastor falls into sin or when a fake pastor falls into sin they trumpet and sensationalize it. Even when a man of God repents of their sin they still sensationalize it. It's just like how David even after he repents of his sin with Bathsheba still gets scorned. The priests no matter how many sexual crimes they committed are still well-accepted. Ahab was such a wicked king and people still kept accepting him anyway. The Vatican scandals have been well-hidden throughout the centuries. A bigger problem arises when historical facts and current events will prove what they call as "myths" are wrong. They would probably say that "The Devil is just clouding your mind!" whenever the violent truth of the Vatican's history comes out. I remembered how often news reports linked to Roman Catholic priests come out and all I hear from some Roman Catholics is that Satan is clouding my mind. Not to mention that a lot of quack pastors involved in sex scandals are also aligned with the Vatican. 

Okay, I don't deny that I can agree with some issues that the Roman Catholic media is against. They are right whenever they protest against pornography, abortion, narcotics, sex education, population control or anything that the Bible condemns as wrong. The problem is the motives that they have and how often they are pretty much "Follow what I say but not what I do." like the Pharisees. How often is it that any march against abortion done by a Roman Catholic community ends up covering up the sins of fornication between priests and nuns? Some incidents have verified how abortion happens behind the closed doors of a convent to hide the sins of the priests and nuns. Other incidents have pointed out priests who are indulging in sexually degenerate media and behavior. Some priests are even protecting big time narcotic dealers. What's the use of protesting against certain sins if you're having a walk for life for people who violate the right to life to be protected against the sword of God's law? Romans 13:1-2 doesn't tell the government to plant onions with the sword but to slay evildoers if necessary with the sword. God ordained the death penalty therefore it can't be an act of murder.

There are some historical proofs that the Vatican has used various religious orders to destabilize governments even before the Jesuit Order was established by Ignatius of Loyola. The Foxe's Book of Martyrs, the books of Augustus Toplady and the writings of Charles H. Spurgeon are among a few to reveal the treachery of the Vatican in destabilizing the world. The Dominicans created the Spanish Inquisition not only to convert people to Roman Catholicism even through violent means but also to destabilize governments. The Jesuit Order wasn't only created to counter the Reformation but also to help infiltrate and destroy governments. They only want to back up any government official who sides with the but will go against anyone who doesn't want to be their puppet. They may even be responsible for installing people who aren't legitimately voted into seats of power. What's even sad is that the average Roman Catholic isn't even aware of the anomalies that has long plagued them behind the scenes. But even if they are they are some of them would still cover them up. 

What can Christians do? This is not a call to argue or quarrel with Roman Catholics. This is a call to evangelize them. They are stuck in the power of the Devil and they don't know it. They are the mission field to evangelize. They're lost in sin. Christians are not to exercise the state responsibility of death penalty. The task of bearing the sword was given to the state and not to the Church. This is a call to preach against sin and the Savior from sin. What's so sad is that many Roman Catholics love their sin too much to leave their system of hypocrisy. They just love their system that somehow allows them to sin all they want, go to confession, do penance, go to Mass and live like the rest of the world. If that's so then whose really living like someone has a license to sin? This should also serve as a warning of what Christians should avoid doing. It would be stupid and hypocritical to criticize the hypocrisy-driven Roman Catholic mass media if Christians don't expose fake pastors for the scam artists they are. There should be no cover-ups and fake Baptist or any evangelical or Protestant churches that are involved in scandals that could damage any Christian gullible enough to support them. Any evil must be rebuked and there must be no selective outrage or selective justice when it comes to sin. 
Revelation 18:4-5 
And I heard another voice from Heaven, saying, Come out of her, My people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities.

Even so come Lord Jesus!

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Ken Ham's Illustrations on Spiritual Warfare Against Humanism

Dr. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis made these beautiful illustrations to show what's wrong with the church today. Let's take a look at the two illustrations on how Christians engage their spiritual warfare. 
The first illustration reveals the following:
One member is asleep when he should be doing something.Another person is firing at the balloons because the person who's supposed to fire it is asleep on the job.Somebody is focused on deflecting cannon balls than hitting the source of the cannon balls.Somebody is treating the whole situation like a game.  
By doing so, humanism is victorious whenever the local church is asleep. This is the problem to why Christians tend to fall down in battle at times:
Ezekiel 22:30 And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before Me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none.
In short, if you're not going to stand in the gap on behalf of the land then who will? It's the…

The Ridiculous Roman Catholic View That Marriage Must Be Done Inside Their Church or It's Invalid

I remembered reading through the seven sacraments or ordinances of the Roman Catholic institution in a catechism. One of the teachings is that marriage must be treated as a sacrament. What it also implies is that if your marriage is done in a civil court that even if it was duly registered, that both couples were in a sexually pure union then it's not a marriage. So does that mean that a person can marry in a civil court, get divorced and marry his next spouse in the Roman Catholic institution?

Let's address the issue of civil marriage that is pure and holy. In short there was no incest, no adultery and it was between two people who are eligible for marriage. So why should the Roman Catholic institution even think that two people who got married with the sexually pure prerequisites in the eyes of God should be rejected. Is it because unless it's a priest who performs the marriage then the marriage can't be validated? It's a problem with how Roman Catholics have thei…

Don't Forget That the Roman Catholic Institution Has a Very Long History of Inciting Sedition

The Roman Catholic institution has its long fraudulent history of claiming to be the "One True Church that was founded n 33 A.D. - Holy, Catholic and Apostolic". The word catholic is a synonym for universal but the disciples were never first called Catholics in Antioch but Christians (Acts 11:26). Catholic was used as an old world for universal which some people today are allergic to that word because Catholic has been used to describe people who are members of the Roman Catholic institution. What can be talked about now is the fact that the Roman Catholic institution has had a long history of inciting sedition in governments. While they claim it to be doing the "work of God" or as the Jesuits say "Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam" or "For the greater glory of God." but is it really?

Doing some study of the history of the Vatican has it shown that the Inquisition and later the Jesuit Order have a lot of bloody rags to answer for. Did you know that many ki…

Testimony of Former Jesuit Priest Victor J. Affonso

To Follow Jesus Without Compromise by Victor J. Affonso
Why I joined the Society of Jesus
At the age of 23, I was a successful commercial artist on the verge of going abroad where a job was awaiting me. I was happy at the prospect of leaving India and thereby also escaping the terrible anguish caused of seeing the misery of the poor in the streets of Bombay.
Political saviors like Gandhi and Nehru had failed in giving true freedom and justice to India’s poor majority. Murder and divisions assailed “independent” India, and so it still is today. All the social works were but a few drops of water in a desert. Yet there was still one solution left: The words of Jesus kept coming to me during prayer, “…For with God ALL things are possible” (Mark 10:27). “Don’t run away!” On another day I heard the words, “Follow My Son — Jesus!” This word finally led me to leave the world and join the Society of Jesus, a missionary order that promised by its very title, its “Spiritual Exercises” and its C…

Understanding Ignatius of Antioch's Statement on the Eucharist

It's already expected that Roman Catholicism takes Scriptures out of context and/or purposely misreads it. If they can't even handle the Word of God with reverence then I don't expect them to handle anything else with reverence except it be the writing of the past Popes and the Roman Catholic priests. One such man is the Christian bishop or overseer. In case Roman Catholics want to argue that the term "bishop" would prove he's one of their kind then they are mistaken. To be a bishop according to 1 Timothy 3:1-7 is to be a church leader. Besides, the same passage says that bishops must be family men of moral dignity which is impossible for a Roman Catholic priest who's bound to celibacy. Please note 1 Corinthians 7:35-37 is not a command for priests to stay single all their lives!
Now here's a popular misquote from the very passage of Ignatius of Antioch to justify the doctrine of transubstantiation: They abstain from the eucharist and from prayer, bec…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

God's Curse Upon Gambling!

One of the greatest hypocrisies that people are facing right now is the sin of legalized gambling. Why do I dare say it is hypocritical? It's because for one legalized gambling promotes all type of filth. We have laws against adultery but not against pornography, we have laws against stealing but not against gambling which is really a sin. Today, Christians must voice out not only against legalized prostitution and legalized pornography, they must also voice against legalized gambling. 1 Timothy 6:10 is true that in these days, the love for money is the root of all evil in the secular world plus gambling is mainly rooted upon the love for money. We ought to think that in every way, money is not evil but the love for it is really evil. Gambling in itself is fed because of the love of money. Pastor Mike Stahl a Baptist preacher had also revealed the ill effects of gambling, in truth it is a very lucrative business that sadly destroys lives. To be honest, gambling has been one of th…