Skip to main content

If Your Church Is Having a Sunday Concert Then It Is Not a Sunday Worship Service


It's stupid to use carnal means to get people into the church. If that church is using carnal means then one should question the salvation of the pastor and the people who attend its services. They can't even be called an assembly of Christians or members of the Body of Christ. One of the worst heresies to come into the Sunday worship service is when what should be a solemn time of worship gets involved with theatrics or entertainment driven services rather than the sanctity of a worship service. Those who accuse born again Christians of having a Sunday concert might need to realize that we are not an entertainment driven group.

People today tend to get bored and want to feed the flesh. This makes seeker sensitive churches or "easy Christianity" churches a huge sensation and they have lots of members. Some of these "easy Christianity" churches may call themselves Baptist but I call them "Baptwists" because they claim to be Baptist but they twist the truth. If preaching unsound doctrine isn't enough (2 Timothy 4:3-4) then why not have a rock and roll concert to make it even worldlier? Instead of a preaching you're having the worshipers cheer for more singing. Christian songs are given rock and roll tunes.

Old time preachers warned about the rise of entertainment driven churches

What's really so scary is that the entertainment driven church was already predicted long ago. The late Charles H. Spurgeon said in "Feeding Sheep or Amusing Goats":
An evil is in the professed camp of the Lord, so gross in its impudence, that the most shortsighted can hardly fail to notice it during the past few years. It has developed at an abnormal rate, even for evil. It has worked like leaven until the whole lump ferments. The devil has seldom done a cleverer thing than hinting to the church that part of their mission is to provide entertainment for the people, with a view to winning them. 
From speaking out as the Puritans did, the church has gradually toned down her testimony, then winked at and excused the frivolities of the day. Then she tolerated them in her borders. Now she has adopted them under the plea of reaching the masses. 
My first contention is that providing amusement for the people is nowhere spoken of in the Scriptures as a function of the church. If it is a Christian work, why did not Christ speak of it? "Go ye into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature" (Mark 16:15). That is clear enough. So it would have been if He had added, "and provide amusement for those who do not relish the gospel." No such words, however, are to be found. It did not seem to occur to him. 
Then again, "He gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some evangelists; and some pastors and teachers .., for the work of the ministry" (Eph. 4:11-12). Where do entertainers come in? The Holy Spirit is silent concerning them. Were the prophets persecuted because they amused the people or because they refused? The concert has no martyr roll. 
Again, providing amusement is in direct antagonism to the teaching and life of Christ and all his apostles. What was the attitude of the church to the world? Ye are the salt" (Matt. 5:13), not the sugar candy---something the world will spit out not swallow. Short and sharp was the utterance, "Let the dead bury their dead" (Matt. 8:22) He was in awful earnestness. 
Had Christ introduced more of the bright and pleasant elements into his mission, he would have been more popular when they went back, because of the searching nature of His teaching. I do not hear him say, "Run after these people Peter and tell them we will have a different style of service tomorrow, something short and attractive with little preaching. We will have a pleasant evening for the people. Tell them they will be sure to enjoy it. Be quick Peter, we must get the people somehow." Jesus pitied sinners, sighed and wept over them, but never sought to amuse them. 
In vain will the Epistles be searched to find any trace of this gospel of amusement! Their message is, "Come out, keep out, keep clean out!" Anything approaching fooling is conspicuous by its absence. They had boundless confidence in the gospel and employed no other weapon. 
After Peter and John were locked up for preaching, the church had a prayer meeting but they did not pray, "Lord grant unto thy servants that by a wise and discriminating use of innocent recreation we may show these people how happy we are." If they ceased not from preaching Christ, they had not time for arranging entertainments. Scattered by persecution, they went everywhere preaching the gospel. They turned the world upside down (Acts 17:6). That is the only difference! Lord, clear the church of all the rot and rubbish the devil has imposed on her, and bring us back to apostolic methods. 
Lastly, the mission of amusement fails to effect the end desired. It works havoc among young converts. Let the careless and scoffers, who thank God because the church met them halfway, speak and testify. Let the heavy laden who found peace through the concert not keep silent! Let the drunkard to whom the dramatic entertainment has been God's link in the chain of the conversion, stand up! There are none to answer. The mission of amusement produces no converts. The need of the hour for today's ministry is believing scholarship joined with earnest spirituality, the one springing from the other as fruit from the root. The need is biblical doctrine, so understood and felt, that it sets men on fire.

Worldly music or worship music? 

Do you know music is important in worship? Many people say it's just stupid to say music is part of worship. Why have secularized styles of music into the worship service? Worse, you may even be having these churches that are actually singing blatantly occultic or sensual songs during a worship concert. I got sick to realize how often I listened to Hillsongs a lot when I was newly saved only to find out something is pretty wrong with an organization that claims to be Christian. I remembered the time I did some research on rock and roll music and that there is no way that it could ever be integrated for worship purposes. I was called a bigot for rejecting rock and roll worship never mind it does not glorify God.

There's always the excuse that you can worship God in any way you want. That is both true and false. God has given people the freedom of choice but has restricted it with rules for one's own protection. You can worship God by singing this hymn or that hymn but you cannot use worldly music. There's the freedom to use words to make whatever hymn you want but you have to make sure that the words glorify God and not man. You have the freedom to compose any tune for the hymn but you should always make sure that it's the tune that fits right in to worship. It's not just words or tune but it's all about the lyrics.

The rise of Contemporary Christian Music and Christian rock is a real problem. Some of these people are even allied with the Vatican. It made my heart break to learn that Don Moen actually sang for Pope Francis. I wasn't surprised to learn some "Christian" artists are actually allied with the Vatican or are members of anti-Catholic "Christian" cults. Using rock and roll to sing praises destroys the purpose of what worship should be. It should be God-centered and not man-centered.

What should also be mentioned is the immoral fruits of the "Christian" artists. It's very common for the blatantly secular entertainers to live an immoral lifestyle. It's already expected that the next door Catholic priest may be raping an altar boy or nuns who have sexual affairs with each other or with the priests. It's already expected religious Roman Catholic artists may be living an immoral life. But the problem is even bigger when we endorse these "Christian" artists and their worldly tunes as "Christian" when the evidence suggests otherwise.

It's no wonder that the late D. Martin Lloyd Jones said:
Once you have lost the division between the world and the Church–the Church ceases to be truly Christian! 

I couldn't agree any more. Using worldly means to drive in members just creates more and more false converts. It's no wonder why that the worst trap door churches today may not be the local Roman Catholic parish, the local Mormon parish, the local Watchtower parish or any "Christian" organizations that are not Christian but so-called Christian organizations that have lost its division between the world and the Church. How sad it is if you wanted to go to a Baptist church but it turned out to be just as much as a gate of Hell as a Roman Catholic parish.

Focusing on God and not entertainment is what having a Sunday worship service is about

While I do believe that no Sunday worship is ever complete without singing hymns, praises and the choir but it's not the focus. Singing hymns and praises can't be separated from worship or to set the atmosphere for worship. Nothing is wrong with the pastor mentioning some jokes to drive a point in the message to liven up the atmosphere as long as he doesn't tell any indecent stuff.

After reading John F. MacArthur's book "Worship: The Ultimate Priority" which I have found on pages 29-30 under True Worship:
Those sermons on worship also signaled  the beginning of a new era for our church. The worship in our Sunday gatherings took on a whole new depth and significance. People began to be conscious at every aspect of the order of service - the music, the praying, the preaching, and even offering - is worship rendered unto God. They began to look at every kind of superficiality as an affront to a holy God. They saw worship as a participant's activity, not a spectator sport. Many realized for the first time that worship is the church's ultimate priority - not public relations, not recreation and social activities, not boosting attendance figures - but worshiping God.
Furthermore, as our congregation began to think more earnestly than ever about worship, we were continually drawn to the only reliable and sufficient worship manual - Scripture. If God desires worship in spirt and truth, and if worship is something offered to God - and not just a show put on for the benefit of the congregation - then every aspect of our worship must be pleasing to God in harmony with His Word. So the effect of our renewed emphasis on worship was that it heightened our commitment to the centrality of Scripture. 

No worship service is ever complete without the sermon. Did you bother to read Acts 2? Peter gave his first pastoral message in that whole chapter. Every time there was fellowship there was always preaching on the Word of God. From page 36-37 of "Worship: The Ultimate Priority", I would like to also quote on what MacArthur said about the importance of preaching:
Preaching is an irreplaceable aspect of all corporate worship. In fact, the whole church should revolve around the ministry of the Word. Everything else is either preparatory or a response to the message from Scripture. 
When drama, music, comedy or other activities are allowed to usurp the preaching of the Word, true worship inevitably suffers. And when preaching is subjugated to pomp and circumstance, that also hinders real worship. A "worship" service without the ministry of the Word of God is of questionable value. Moreover a "church" where the Word of God is not regularly and faithfully preached is no true church.  
Edify the flock. Scripture tells us that the purpose of our spiritual gifts is for the edification of the whole church (Ephesians 4:12; cf. 1 Corinthians 14:12). Therefore all ministry in the context of the church should somehow be edifying - building up the flock, not just stirring emotions.  
Above all, ministry should be aimed at stimulating genuine worship. To do that it must be edifying. This is implied by the expression "worship... in spirit and truth." As we have noted repeatedly, worship should engage the intellect and as well as emotions. By all means worship should be passionate, heartfelt and moving. But the point is not to stir the emotions while turning off the mind. True worship merges heart and mind in a response of pure adoration based on the truth revealed in the Word.
Music may sometimes move us by the sheer beauty of its sound, but such a sentiment is not worship. Music by itself, apart from the truth contained in the lyrics, is not a legitimate springboard for real worship. Similarly, a poignant story may be touching or stirring, but unless the message it conveys is set to the context of biblical truth, any emotions it may stir are of no use in prompting genuine worship. Aroused passons are nt necessarily evidence that true worship is taking place. 
Genuine worship is a response to divine truth. It is passionate because it arises out of our love for God. But to be true worship it must also arise out of a correct understanding of His law, His righteousness, His mercy and His real Being. Real worship acknowledges God as He has revealed Himself in His Word. We know from Scripture, for example, that He is the only perfectly holy, all-powerful, all-knowing, omnipresent source from which flows all goodness, mercy, truth, wisdom, power and salvation. Worship means ascribing glory to Him because of those truths. It means adoring Him for who he is, for what He has done, and for what He has promised. It must therefore be a response to the truth that He has revealed about Himself. Such worship cannot rise out of a vacuum. It is prompted and vitalized by the objective truth of the Word.

Unless the pastor preaches the Word of God accurately and God-honoring music is used then it is not a Sunday worship service. If the whole focus is no longer God then it is no longer a worship service. The question is are you attending a worship service or just a Sunday morning or evening concert? It would be a cold day in Hell before a Sunday concert will ever become a Sunday worship service.


See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Sorry Homosexuals, God Owns the Rainbow, Not You!

I found this absolutely funny picture and the maker got it right about homosexual activists getting mad at the rainbow light in the Noah's Park exhibit. Who could forget the time when homosexual marriage was made legal that those who are for it used the rainbow on their pictures on Facebook profiles or in other social networks. They claimed the rainbow as their color. I don't apologize for speaking the truth. The Bible is God's covenant with man and not homosexuality's banner of success. Genesis 9:14-17 - "And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud: and I will remember my covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh. And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth. And God said …

Politically Correct Organizations Need to Take the Beam Out of Their Own Eye First

Politically correct organizations meddling in worldwide affairs is not anything new. Whether it's the Vatican, the European Union, the United Nations, Human Rights Watch and any organization driven by political correctness (and not all of them are Illuminati or Jesuit ran but they're all still dupes of Satan and most of them don't even know it) it's always a problem that they are indeed meddling. While meddling isn't inherently wrong but here's some problems with politically correct organizations:
They only meddle when it's convenient for them as they are guilty of both selective outrage and selective justice.They meddle in the affairs of others without considering their own yard first.They meddle like as if they own the world.
It's stupid how political correctness demands Christians not to judge others but they end up failing to judge themselves. They are always taking "Judge not and you will not be judged." out of context without knowing wha…

The Error of Comparing Protestantism to New Atheism

The amazing blindness of Catholic.com is too amazing isn't it? I just read an article written yesterday which compares Protestantism to New Atheism. As much as the article is written as professionally as possible in contrast to some self-proclaimed apologists I've had a lot of useless arguments with but I'd like to give a friendly rebuke to the writer Karlo Broussard. It's my sincere prayer that Broussard will see the truth from the pages of the Scripture. 
The writer commits the fallacy of categorical error. He compares Sola Scriptura with Richard Dawkins' views on science. Here's one of the statements that really should be considered a categorical error:
Just as science is the only tool Dawkins and company are willing to use to arrive at knowledge of the natural truth, Protestants use only the Bible for determining what is revealed truth. And as many modern atheists reject anything that science cannot detect, so too do Protestants reject any teaching that is…

The Quest For "Unlimited Human Progress" is Really Destroying the Environment

Every time I read from the news of nature's decline due to pollution, how food supply can soon drop anytime, how plant and animal deaths are massively happening I can't help but blame it on one factor: SIN. Yes, sin and most people think it's a fantasy word. It wasn't just a fantasy word that kicked Adam and Eve out of Eden and cursed the Earth with all its imperfections. Sin brought disease and destruction to mankind. Unfortunately, man is to blame for the wanton destruction of the environment all in the name of "unlimited human progress".

You can't divorce science from the Creator and that's a fact. Yet you have people who want to benefit from science without considering the Creator. Christian scientists were conservative because they were aware of one truth that science without ethics is meaningless. I'd like to expand it to say that studying creation without the Creator is absolutely stupid. People can claim that removing God is the key to &qu…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

What's Wrong with the Ang Dating Daan Movement?

The Ang Dating Daan movement is by the Members Church of God International spearheaded by its pastor (and so-called "prophet") Eliseo Soriano.  While claiming to be an expositor of the Scriptures with his "Itanong Mo Kay Soriano" or "Ask Soriano" In English, this religious group actually isn't Christian as some of the ignorant would want to believe.  Though the group claims the Bible is their only authority (as some cults do) but the problem is that they believe only Eli Soriano may interpret the Scriptures.  This is utter heresy!  Not even a great man in the Scriptures, Charles Spurgeon ever made such a preposterous claim!  This is no better than the "true church" movement by Darwin Fish which is exposed by Pastor Phil Johnson as a heretical movement.  In fact, I'm not going to waste my time debating with ADD members, they are a total waste of my time as every other debate.
Unlike John F. Macarthur of Grace to You that actually encoura…

Testimony of Former Iglesia Ni Cristo Member, Now a Born Again Christian

Editor's note: 
First and foremost, I would like to thank the Bereans for this wonderful story of a former Iglesia ni Cristo minister (or pastor), now he has become a Baptist Christian.  It's a sad story that some people have just jumped from one cult to another.  Some members of the Watchtower Society, Charismatic Movement or the Iglesia ni Cristo have left Roman Catholicism but they have never truly come to know the truth of salvation is by faith in Christ alone and that any good works after Christian life is but the grace of God at work in the believer.  Now for this brave testimony that I can really share after many years of searching for one testimony which I hope will further bring more INC members to Jesus Christ.

May I begin with a word of prayer that in the midst of all these trouble, I call upon Jesus Christ the Son of God who the Iglesia ni Cristo deny is indeed God, the only way to salvation, that they trust upon their works and church membership than Him alone.  I…