Skip to main content

If Your Church Is Having a Sunday Concert Then It Is Not a Sunday Worship Service


It's stupid to use carnal means to get people into the church. If that church is using carnal means then one should question the salvation of the pastor and the people who attend its services. They can't even be called an assembly of Christians or members of the Body of Christ. One of the worst heresies to come into the Sunday worship service is when what should be a solemn time of worship gets involved with theatrics or entertainment driven services rather than the sanctity of a worship service. Those who accuse born again Christians of having a Sunday concert might need to realize that we are not an entertainment driven group.

People today tend to get bored and want to feed the flesh. This makes seeker sensitive churches or "easy Christianity" churches a huge sensation and they have lots of members. Some of these "easy Christianity" churches may call themselves Baptist but I call them "Baptwists" because they claim to be Baptist but they twist the truth. If preaching unsound doctrine isn't enough (2 Timothy 4:3-4) then why not have a rock and roll concert to make it even worldlier? Instead of a preaching you're having the worshipers cheer for more singing. Christian songs are given rock and roll tunes.

Old time preachers warned about the rise of entertainment driven churches

What's really so scary is that the entertainment driven church was already predicted long ago. The late Charles H. Spurgeon said in "Feeding Sheep or Amusing Goats":
An evil is in the professed camp of the Lord, so gross in its impudence, that the most shortsighted can hardly fail to notice it during the past few years. It has developed at an abnormal rate, even for evil. It has worked like leaven until the whole lump ferments. The devil has seldom done a cleverer thing than hinting to the church that part of their mission is to provide entertainment for the people, with a view to winning them. 
From speaking out as the Puritans did, the church has gradually toned down her testimony, then winked at and excused the frivolities of the day. Then she tolerated them in her borders. Now she has adopted them under the plea of reaching the masses. 
My first contention is that providing amusement for the people is nowhere spoken of in the Scriptures as a function of the church. If it is a Christian work, why did not Christ speak of it? "Go ye into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature" (Mark 16:15). That is clear enough. So it would have been if He had added, "and provide amusement for those who do not relish the gospel." No such words, however, are to be found. It did not seem to occur to him. 
Then again, "He gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some evangelists; and some pastors and teachers .., for the work of the ministry" (Eph. 4:11-12). Where do entertainers come in? The Holy Spirit is silent concerning them. Were the prophets persecuted because they amused the people or because they refused? The concert has no martyr roll. 
Again, providing amusement is in direct antagonism to the teaching and life of Christ and all his apostles. What was the attitude of the church to the world? Ye are the salt" (Matt. 5:13), not the sugar candy---something the world will spit out not swallow. Short and sharp was the utterance, "Let the dead bury their dead" (Matt. 8:22) He was in awful earnestness. 
Had Christ introduced more of the bright and pleasant elements into his mission, he would have been more popular when they went back, because of the searching nature of His teaching. I do not hear him say, "Run after these people Peter and tell them we will have a different style of service tomorrow, something short and attractive with little preaching. We will have a pleasant evening for the people. Tell them they will be sure to enjoy it. Be quick Peter, we must get the people somehow." Jesus pitied sinners, sighed and wept over them, but never sought to amuse them. 
In vain will the Epistles be searched to find any trace of this gospel of amusement! Their message is, "Come out, keep out, keep clean out!" Anything approaching fooling is conspicuous by its absence. They had boundless confidence in the gospel and employed no other weapon. 
After Peter and John were locked up for preaching, the church had a prayer meeting but they did not pray, "Lord grant unto thy servants that by a wise and discriminating use of innocent recreation we may show these people how happy we are." If they ceased not from preaching Christ, they had not time for arranging entertainments. Scattered by persecution, they went everywhere preaching the gospel. They turned the world upside down (Acts 17:6). That is the only difference! Lord, clear the church of all the rot and rubbish the devil has imposed on her, and bring us back to apostolic methods. 
Lastly, the mission of amusement fails to effect the end desired. It works havoc among young converts. Let the careless and scoffers, who thank God because the church met them halfway, speak and testify. Let the heavy laden who found peace through the concert not keep silent! Let the drunkard to whom the dramatic entertainment has been God's link in the chain of the conversion, stand up! There are none to answer. The mission of amusement produces no converts. The need of the hour for today's ministry is believing scholarship joined with earnest spirituality, the one springing from the other as fruit from the root. The need is biblical doctrine, so understood and felt, that it sets men on fire.

Worldly music or worship music? 

Do you know music is important in worship? Many people say it's just stupid to say music is part of worship. Why have secularized styles of music into the worship service? Worse, you may even be having these churches that are actually singing blatantly occultic or sensual songs during a worship concert. I got sick to realize how often I listened to Hillsongs a lot when I was newly saved only to find out something is pretty wrong with an organization that claims to be Christian. I remembered the time I did some research on rock and roll music and that there is no way that it could ever be integrated for worship purposes. I was called a bigot for rejecting rock and roll worship never mind it does not glorify God.

There's always the excuse that you can worship God in any way you want. That is both true and false. God has given people the freedom of choice but has restricted it with rules for one's own protection. You can worship God by singing this hymn or that hymn but you cannot use worldly music. There's the freedom to use words to make whatever hymn you want but you have to make sure that the words glorify God and not man. You have the freedom to compose any tune for the hymn but you should always make sure that it's the tune that fits right in to worship. It's not just words or tune but it's all about the lyrics.

The rise of Contemporary Christian Music and Christian rock is a real problem. Some of these people are even allied with the Vatican. It made my heart break to learn that Don Moen actually sang for Pope Francis. I wasn't surprised to learn some "Christian" artists are actually allied with the Vatican or are members of anti-Catholic "Christian" cults. Using rock and roll to sing praises destroys the purpose of what worship should be. It should be God-centered and not man-centered.

What should also be mentioned is the immoral fruits of the "Christian" artists. It's very common for the blatantly secular entertainers to live an immoral lifestyle. It's already expected that the next door Catholic priest may be raping an altar boy or nuns who have sexual affairs with each other or with the priests. It's already expected religious Roman Catholic artists may be living an immoral life. But the problem is even bigger when we endorse these "Christian" artists and their worldly tunes as "Christian" when the evidence suggests otherwise.

It's no wonder that the late D. Martin Lloyd Jones said:
Once you have lost the division between the world and the Church–the Church ceases to be truly Christian! 

I couldn't agree any more. Using worldly means to drive in members just creates more and more false converts. It's no wonder why that the worst trap door churches today may not be the local Roman Catholic parish, the local Mormon parish, the local Watchtower parish or any "Christian" organizations that are not Christian but so-called Christian organizations that have lost its division between the world and the Church. How sad it is if you wanted to go to a Baptist church but it turned out to be just as much as a gate of Hell as a Roman Catholic parish.

Focusing on God and not entertainment is what having a Sunday worship service is about

While I do believe that no Sunday worship is ever complete without singing hymns, praises and the choir but it's not the focus. Singing hymns and praises can't be separated from worship or to set the atmosphere for worship. Nothing is wrong with the pastor mentioning some jokes to drive a point in the message to liven up the atmosphere as long as he doesn't tell any indecent stuff.

After reading John F. MacArthur's book "Worship: The Ultimate Priority" which I have found on pages 29-30 under True Worship:
Those sermons on worship also signaled  the beginning of a new era for our church. The worship in our Sunday gatherings took on a whole new depth and significance. People began to be conscious at every aspect of the order of service - the music, the praying, the preaching, and even offering - is worship rendered unto God. They began to look at every kind of superficiality as an affront to a holy God. They saw worship as a participant's activity, not a spectator sport. Many realized for the first time that worship is the church's ultimate priority - not public relations, not recreation and social activities, not boosting attendance figures - but worshiping God.
Furthermore, as our congregation began to think more earnestly than ever about worship, we were continually drawn to the only reliable and sufficient worship manual - Scripture. If God desires worship in spirt and truth, and if worship is something offered to God - and not just a show put on for the benefit of the congregation - then every aspect of our worship must be pleasing to God in harmony with His Word. So the effect of our renewed emphasis on worship was that it heightened our commitment to the centrality of Scripture. 

No worship service is ever complete without the sermon. Did you bother to read Acts 2? Peter gave his first pastoral message in that whole chapter. Every time there was fellowship there was always preaching on the Word of God. From page 36-37 of "Worship: The Ultimate Priority", I would like to also quote on what MacArthur said about the importance of preaching:
Preaching is an irreplaceable aspect of all corporate worship. In fact, the whole church should revolve around the ministry of the Word. Everything else is either preparatory or a response to the message from Scripture. 
When drama, music, comedy or other activities are allowed to usurp the preaching of the Word, true worship inevitably suffers. And when preaching is subjugated to pomp and circumstance, that also hinders real worship. A "worship" service without the ministry of the Word of God is of questionable value. Moreover a "church" where the Word of God is not regularly and faithfully preached is no true church.  
Edify the flock. Scripture tells us that the purpose of our spiritual gifts is for the edification of the whole church (Ephesians 4:12; cf. 1 Corinthians 14:12). Therefore all ministry in the context of the church should somehow be edifying - building up the flock, not just stirring emotions.  
Above all, ministry should be aimed at stimulating genuine worship. To do that it must be edifying. This is implied by the expression "worship... in spirit and truth." As we have noted repeatedly, worship should engage the intellect and as well as emotions. By all means worship should be passionate, heartfelt and moving. But the point is not to stir the emotions while turning off the mind. True worship merges heart and mind in a response of pure adoration based on the truth revealed in the Word.
Music may sometimes move us by the sheer beauty of its sound, but such a sentiment is not worship. Music by itself, apart from the truth contained in the lyrics, is not a legitimate springboard for real worship. Similarly, a poignant story may be touching or stirring, but unless the message it conveys is set to the context of biblical truth, any emotions it may stir are of no use in prompting genuine worship. Aroused passons are nt necessarily evidence that true worship is taking place. 
Genuine worship is a response to divine truth. It is passionate because it arises out of our love for God. But to be true worship it must also arise out of a correct understanding of His law, His righteousness, His mercy and His real Being. Real worship acknowledges God as He has revealed Himself in His Word. We know from Scripture, for example, that He is the only perfectly holy, all-powerful, all-knowing, omnipresent source from which flows all goodness, mercy, truth, wisdom, power and salvation. Worship means ascribing glory to Him because of those truths. It means adoring Him for who he is, for what He has done, and for what He has promised. It must therefore be a response to the truth that He has revealed about Himself. Such worship cannot rise out of a vacuum. It is prompted and vitalized by the objective truth of the Word.

Unless the pastor preaches the Word of God accurately and God-honoring music is used then it is not a Sunday worship service. If the whole focus is no longer God then it is no longer a worship service. The question is are you attending a worship service or just a Sunday morning or evening concert? It would be a cold day in Hell before a Sunday concert will ever become a Sunday worship service.


See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Ken Ham's Illustrations on Spiritual Warfare Against Humanism

Dr. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis made these beautiful illustrations to show what's wrong with the church today. Let's take a look at the two illustrations on how Christians engage their spiritual warfare. 
The first illustration reveals the following:
One member is asleep when he should be doing something.Another person is firing at the balloons because the person who's supposed to fire it is asleep on the job.Somebody is focused on deflecting cannon balls than hitting the source of the cannon balls.Somebody is treating the whole situation like a game.  
By doing so, humanism is victorious whenever the local church is asleep. This is the problem to why Christians tend to fall down in battle at times:
Ezekiel 22:30 And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before Me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none.
In short, if you're not going to stand in the gap on behalf of the land then who will? It's the…

The Ridiculous Roman Catholic View That Marriage Must Be Done Inside Their Church or It's Invalid

I remembered reading through the seven sacraments or ordinances of the Roman Catholic institution in a catechism. One of the teachings is that marriage must be treated as a sacrament. What it also implies is that if your marriage is done in a civil court that even if it was duly registered, that both couples were in a sexually pure union then it's not a marriage. So does that mean that a person can marry in a civil court, get divorced and marry his next spouse in the Roman Catholic institution?

Let's address the issue of civil marriage that is pure and holy. In short there was no incest, no adultery and it was between two people who are eligible for marriage. So why should the Roman Catholic institution even think that two people who got married with the sexually pure prerequisites in the eyes of God should be rejected. Is it because unless it's a priest who performs the marriage then the marriage can't be validated? It's a problem with how Roman Catholics have thei…

Don't Forget That the Roman Catholic Institution Has a Very Long History of Inciting Sedition

The Roman Catholic institution has its long fraudulent history of claiming to be the "One True Church that was founded n 33 A.D. - Holy, Catholic and Apostolic". The word catholic is a synonym for universal but the disciples were never first called Catholics in Antioch but Christians (Acts 11:26). Catholic was used as an old world for universal which some people today are allergic to that word because Catholic has been used to describe people who are members of the Roman Catholic institution. What can be talked about now is the fact that the Roman Catholic institution has had a long history of inciting sedition in governments. While they claim it to be doing the "work of God" or as the Jesuits say "Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam" or "For the greater glory of God." but is it really?

Doing some study of the history of the Vatican has it shown that the Inquisition and later the Jesuit Order have a lot of bloody rags to answer for. Did you know that many ki…

Testimony of Former Jesuit Priest Victor J. Affonso

To Follow Jesus Without Compromise by Victor J. Affonso
Why I joined the Society of Jesus
At the age of 23, I was a successful commercial artist on the verge of going abroad where a job was awaiting me. I was happy at the prospect of leaving India and thereby also escaping the terrible anguish caused of seeing the misery of the poor in the streets of Bombay.
Political saviors like Gandhi and Nehru had failed in giving true freedom and justice to India’s poor majority. Murder and divisions assailed “independent” India, and so it still is today. All the social works were but a few drops of water in a desert. Yet there was still one solution left: The words of Jesus kept coming to me during prayer, “…For with God ALL things are possible” (Mark 10:27). “Don’t run away!” On another day I heard the words, “Follow My Son — Jesus!” This word finally led me to leave the world and join the Society of Jesus, a missionary order that promised by its very title, its “Spiritual Exercises” and its C…

Understanding Ignatius of Antioch's Statement on the Eucharist

It's already expected that Roman Catholicism takes Scriptures out of context and/or purposely misreads it. If they can't even handle the Word of God with reverence then I don't expect them to handle anything else with reverence except it be the writing of the past Popes and the Roman Catholic priests. One such man is the Christian bishop or overseer. In case Roman Catholics want to argue that the term "bishop" would prove he's one of their kind then they are mistaken. To be a bishop according to 1 Timothy 3:1-7 is to be a church leader. Besides, the same passage says that bishops must be family men of moral dignity which is impossible for a Roman Catholic priest who's bound to celibacy. Please note 1 Corinthians 7:35-37 is not a command for priests to stay single all their lives!
Now here's a popular misquote from the very passage of Ignatius of Antioch to justify the doctrine of transubstantiation: They abstain from the eucharist and from prayer, bec…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

God's Curse Upon Gambling!

One of the greatest hypocrisies that people are facing right now is the sin of legalized gambling. Why do I dare say it is hypocritical? It's because for one legalized gambling promotes all type of filth. We have laws against adultery but not against pornography, we have laws against stealing but not against gambling which is really a sin. Today, Christians must voice out not only against legalized prostitution and legalized pornography, they must also voice against legalized gambling. 1 Timothy 6:10 is true that in these days, the love for money is the root of all evil in the secular world plus gambling is mainly rooted upon the love for money. We ought to think that in every way, money is not evil but the love for it is really evil. Gambling in itself is fed because of the love of money. Pastor Mike Stahl a Baptist preacher had also revealed the ill effects of gambling, in truth it is a very lucrative business that sadly destroys lives. To be honest, gambling has been one of th…