Skip to main content

You Must Have All of Christ or You Have None of Christ

It's a heresy today to try and divide the Lordship of Christ and His office as Master from His role as Savior when all three offices come together. While salvation is indeed not by works but there's one thing we can't deny: Christ is not someone who is divided into portions where one can receive Him as Savior but not as Lord. The teaching itself has been one of the biggest reasons why so many false converts abound today.

It's a heresy today to preach a Christ who is a Savior but not Lord. To say that it's optional to submit to Jesus as Lord is an utter heresy for this reason. Jesus is Lord and you must submit to His Lordship whether you like it or not. Christians are not just required to submit but they will submit. A true and real salvation submits to Christ for salvation and submits to Him in the process of sanctification. The Christian will delight to submit to Christ's Lordship and they delight to see their imperfect but genuine repentance perfected at a daily basis.

The late Aiden W. Tozer said these wonderful quotes from his book "I Call It Heresy":
To urge men and women to believe in a divided Christ is bad teaching for no one can receive half of Christ, or a third of Christ, or a quarter of the Person of Christ! We are not saved by believing in an office nor in a work. (pp. 10-11) 
The Lord will not save those whom He cannot command. He will not divide His offices. You cannot believe on a half-Christ. We take Him for what He is - an anointed Savior and Lord who is King of Kings and Lord of all lords! He would not be Who He is if He saved us and called us and chose us without understand that He can also guide and control our lives. (pp. 18-19)

The analogy can be compared to having a car. Do you want a whole car or do just want portions of a car? You can't have the car when you just have the front or the rear. You must have the whole of the car to have the car. To buy only half of the car is to have no car at all. To think of Jesus as Savior but not Lord is a divided Christ. When a person has truly received Jesus as Savior that person recognizes this fact - Jesus is Lord and Master and He has every right to command the Christian. Anybody who thinks of having Jesus only as Savior but not Lord is not seeing the real Jesus but a false one.

The problem today is that people tend to say, "But the Church is a hospital for sinners and not a museum of righteous saints." I won't apologize that whenever I say that the Church is both a hospital for repentant sinners and a museum of righteous saints. From the same book "I Call It Heresy", A.W. Tozer also rebuked the same foolishness saying:
Brethren, I believe it is the result of faulty teaching to begin with. They thought of the Lord as a hospital and Jesus as chief of staff to fix poor sinners that have gotten into trouble. 
"Fix me up Lord." they have insisted "so that I can go my own way!" 
That is bad teaching, my brethren. (p. 19) 

Have we forgotten that the Church testifies itself as a museum of righteous saints from poor sinners who sought repentance? If all the hospital does is just fix victims without teaching people how to live well then it's no longer a hospital but an institution that cares more about money than saving people. It's really stupid to believe that the Church is a hospital of sinners. It's as sinful as the idea of Roman Catholicism where people seek to use their religious deeds to cover up their sinful lifestyles. How many live sinfully, go to confess their sins to a priest who cannot save souls because he's also a lost sinner, go to Mass on Sundays and do it all over again? Any church claiming to be Christian but teaching the dangerous doctrine of Antinomianism is just as much as a gate of Hell as any cult that claims to be a Christian denomination but it isn't.

The Church's mission is a hospital only for poor repentant sinners. The Lord is not just a hospital and Jesus won't fix poor sinners if they don't want to. No, it's not "Fix me up Lord so that I can go my own way." It's rather "Fix me up Lord and teach me your way." That's what it means for the Church to be a museum of righteous saints and a hospital for sinners. If anybody teaches that salvation is a license to sin is a false convert. Those who are truly saved don't want to live the same wicked life anymore.

To close, here's a quote from the late John Gill who said in "A Body of Divinity":
In subjection to Him, as King of saints, they not only receive Him as their prophet, to teach and instruct them, and embrace His doctrines, and as their Priest by whose sacrifice their sins are expiated but also as their King whose laws and ordinances they cheerfully submit; esteeming His precepts concerning all things, to be right, none of His commandments grievous but from a principle of love to Him, keep and observe them. (p. 555) 

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Do Feminists Ever Realize That Women Shouldn't Use Acts of Violence Against Men?

It's irritating to be told that men shouldn't use violence on women but the other way around is okay. No, it's not okay to hit anyone regardless of gender out of anger or frustration. If men shouldn't hit women except in acts of self-defense then the other way round should apply. But you have to remember the stupidity of selective justice and selective outrage of feminists. They think men should respect them while they think discriminating against men is okay. Their quest for "equality" is nothing more than a big joke.

Why is it usually a big fuzz when a man hits a woman but not so many people react if a woman hits a man? That kind of hypocrisy is worth addressing. They say men shouldn't hit women because they are "weaker" but is it okay for a person of lower rank to attack a person of higher rank? The word submission doesn't exist in the feminist dictionary unless it's men submitting to them. Whether they like it or not the husband is t…

You Can't Preach About God's Love For Sinners Without Preaching About His Wrath Against Sin

It's a problem that so many quack preachers love to preach God's love for sinners but not about God's wrath against them because He must punish both the sin and the sinner. Everything from God's love to His wrath is dictated by the fact that He is holy and you are not. The message about God's love for sinners will make no sense if you don't preach about God's wrath against sin first. I remembered listening to "Hell's Best Kept Secret" and "True and False Conversion" by Ray Comfort. There was this point where Kirk Cameron talked about what if I sold my property to save someone from a disease. If the person doesn't know anything about the disease then my selling of all my property to pay for the badly needed treatment won't make sense. Another illustration was all about the flight. You have to tell the person that the parachute is not meant to improve the flight but to tell the person that it's for emergency reasons. If you…

It's Not Okay to Be Blindly Loyal to the Pope and His Army of Pharisees

Some rabid Roman Catholics keep sensationalizing the sins of fraud pastors (as if true born again Christians ever support them) while they keep hiding the sins of their priests or Pharisees. They also say that born again Christians are blindly loyal to the pastor never mind that they are blindly loyal to the Pope and his Pharisees. Blind loyalty towards a a prosperity gospel pastor, a so-called successor of a so-called last messenger or any quack preacher is no different than blind loyalty towards the Pope and his Pharisees. Worse, Roman Catholics believe that their Pharisees are instruments in saving their souls or that the Pope supposedly holds salvation in his hands never mind all the priestly scandals are telling them otherwise.

I could remember how often Bible reading is discouraged (and yet some of these rabid Roman Catholics tell me I should read the Bible and I can't get wrong with it) because it could drive me crazy from reading it. Some Roman Catholics I've met &quo…

Don't Even Think About Legalizing Prostitution or Sex Trade

There's some people who seek to legalize prostitution. Some "rational" atheists are already talking about prostitution should be legalized so it could be controlled by the government. The claim that "studies" show that prohibition doesn't work is a lie straight from the pits of Hell. The Israelites were doing sin not because God forbade it but because they were disobedient and the rulers did nothing to prevent those sins. It's not surprising is that the same people who seek to legalize prostitution also want to legalize narcotics and hard liquor all in the name of "succeeding in the war against them".

The logic behind legalizing prostitution is that so the government can control them and tax them. But the problem with the quest to legalize prostitution is that it encourages the sin rather than discourage it. The problem is not the war against prostitution but ignoring Ecclesiastes 8:11. Do you know why the war against prostitution isn't wo…

Is Salvation in Peter's Hands (As Well as the Popes) Because Jesus Supposedly Gave Him the Literal Keys of Heaven?

According to a self-proclaimed Roman Catholic apologist (who I'll probably dub as Mr. Whistle when I mention him) he claimed that salvation is in the hands of Peter because Jesus gave the former the keys of Heaven. The guy is clearly taking things out of context with what he says. I wonder does he even bother to check out the idioms of the Bible since some passages use a figure of speech instead of speaking everything literally?

If he can't get Matthew 16:18 correctly where he said that Peter the Rock even when the Good News Translation for Roman Catholics says otherwise (and worse for them Peter is differentiated as a rock and the Rock is clearly not him) then he also misinterprets Matthew 16:19. Let's try to understand Matthew 16:19 with the keys and what they really mean. In his interpretation he's already telling everyone that born again Christians should just go back to the Roman Catholic institution because the Pope supposedly holds salvation in his hands. I don&…

Atheists With Abusive Mindsets Do Exist

It's a myth over the modern world that there's no such thing as an atheist with an abusive mindset. I can see atheists who claim that abuses only come through theism. I don't deny that there's such a thing as religious people with an abusive mindset such as Roman Catholic fanatics, Islamic extremists and any form of religious extremism. The problem of the claim is that it denies the reality that there's such a thing as atheists who have an abusive mindset. One such person is the late Christopher Hitchens who claims that he has the right o treat religion with ridicule, hatred and contempt. Isn't that an example of an atheist with an abusive mindset? Sad to say, Hitchens himself is still cursing God from the pits of Hell. Christians should pray that Richard Dawkins wouldn't make the same wrong decision as Hitchens.

One horrible atheist blogger claimed he was indeed one of the most scientific people on Earth. Just reading his blog alone is so tiresome that I&…

Why This Ministry DOES NOT Support the Westboro Baptist Church

The Westboro Baptist Church is a so-called Baptist institution founded by Fred Phelps who is a lawyer and a theologian. Is it your average Baptist assembly or is this another of Satan's brain children? I would like to present my stand why this ministry does not support the Westboro Baptist Church and why as a Baptist, I do not support them either:
The founder Fred Phelps who serves as its pastor. I do find it disturbing he says that he supports sound doctrine of good Christian preachers of the past like John Calvin and Charles Haddon Spurgeon but his doctrine is not sound at all. His preaching is definitely not balanced. While I do appreciate him attacking the Great Whore of Revelation, apostasy, ecumenism, homosexuality, abortion, pornography and a lot of sins however he is no better than the Roman Catholic institution which he frequently criticizes. Although he claims to be a Calvinist and a Spurgeon fan, however many of those who are Calvinist preachers like Paul Washer, John …