Stop Reading David J. Stewart's Jesus-is-Savior Website, Okay?

By -
Have you ever tried surfing into the website called Jesus-is-Savior? While it does look like that his site is a genuine Christian site - the reality is that it's not. I thought that all the maligning done by this blog "David J. Stewart Exposed" (read it for more information) was just a Jesuit scheme to silence him. However, the site does look like it has plenty of evidence against the said person who got arrested in Guam for pedophilia. Didn't said person write a lot about pedophilia and the Roman Catholic institution? Before you think it's just an "elaborate Jesuit plot" to silence Stewart - it doesn't look like one. Apparently, Stewart himself was arrested, he probably asked somebody to maintain his site, and if there are new articles he may be under parole (because he later pleaded guilty). But that doesn't change the fact that I feel convicted to write about why Stewart is indeed a false brother. I don't take any pleasure in writing this article but I feel that I must!

I remembered reading Stewart's site A LOT back then. I read it a lot from 2007 up to 2011 and I didn't want to believe that he was really a charlatan. I remembered I was hungry for new information. This site felt like it was on fire, it didn't feel like it was on compromise mode, it was diligent in exposing the Vatican (and that led me to think that Stewart's case was probably just a frame-up) but it seems to be very real. His site is also full of conspiracy theories no better than Conspiracy World's Texe Marrs and Alex Jones of Info Wars. The site itself is full of questionable claims such as Islam supposedly having to do nothing with 9/11 (HUH?!), that AIDS was supposedly a bio-weapon, some faulty articles about vaccination, and other conspiracy theory related articles that just don't make sense after you do further research. While he does speak a great degree of truth but this doesn't make whatever lies he's sharing to be the truth. Some information he talks about the Vatican is well-documented and found in other books. This is where the dangerous world of half-truths happen. Sometimes, it's easily said that a half-truth is more misleading than a lie. It misleads the person into a game of confusion when an expert charlatan knows a lot of truth and mixes one's lies into it.

What I failed to notice about this guy is that he's good at double-talking. I remembered reading various articles of his concerning the late Anna Nicole Smith. While he said that Smith herself obviously showed no signs of being born again then why does he even suggest that a Christian can live the way they like? Didn't he emphasize on more than one page that Christians are going to live differently? It seems that this guy is unable to make up his mind. He was even caught saying he isn't a Christian then it says he's a Christian in another. He is either one or the other because any true follower of Christ is a Christian. Can he make up his mind or not? He says he's not Antinomian while, at times, saying that a Christian can live like the rest of the world and still be in Heaven. Hasn't he heard of sham conversions and didn't he at one point say Smith was obviously not a Christian? James 1:8 would call him to be a very double-minded man.

The guy is also a huge supporter of Jack Hyles. What surprised me was that Hyles' sexual misconduct along with his pulpit is well-documented. Was it a Jesuit scheme or has that become a poor excuse for Evangelical immorality to be covered up? While I still believe that the Jesuits are indeed in control of much of the world's affairs - not everything that happens is the fault of the Vatican! If Stewart is indeed part of the Hyles legacy with all the well-documented sexual immoralities then one can assume his pedophilia charge is indeed very real. I first thought that the Jesuits engineered several stories about Hyles until it was proven even by former members. Stewart himself has no right to criticize the Vatican if he's guilty of child abuse charges and supports a pulpit that has been well-documented with sexual immoralities.

Need I mention that the guy also slanders several Christian preachers on his site? He has lumped the likes of Dr. John F. MacArthur, the late Robert C. Sproul Sr., Paul David Washer, and Ray Comfort along with fake preachers like Benny Hinn, Peter Popoff, and Joel Osteen to name a few. I decided to re-read his articles and investigate these sites namely Grace To You, Ligonier Ministries, Heartcry Missionary, and Living Waters to see their beliefs. Neither MacArthur, Sproul, Washer, or Comfort teach works salvation nor loss of salvation - those guys taught eternal security while warning false converts! He doesn't even know what lordship salvation is all about - did he bother to read Theopedia? Not to mention Hyles teaches watered-down repentance which explains where Stewart gets his bad theology from. It's no surprise that he would also accuse David W. Cloud of Way of Life Ministries of works salvation. 

He also has a very distorted view of the Reformation while ironically insisting on using the King James Only. If he did some research then he would realize that the translators of the King James Bible (KJB) were Puritans and Calvinists. Did he even do his research about how the Reformation resulted in the Bible getting translated from Latin to German and English? Did he do any research that John Calvin's Geneva Bible was a forerunner to the KJB? He also has plenty of skewed up information about the Reformers too. 

Teaching eternal security is definitely not enough. Many people today think that they're saved just because they prayed a prayer but there was no real change in their lives. Maybe, that's why Stewart maligned MacArthur, Sproul, Washer, and Comfort with out-of-context information. If he does take time to read MacArthur's stand on the Mark of the Beast. MacArthur doesn't say it's not sinful to receive it but he believes that unbelievers who took it can still be forgiven like every other lost sinner. Also, if he analyzed Washer's sermons properly - sermons like the "Shocking Youth Message" emphasize also on eternal security but warn that fake converts do exist. 

It's safe to assume that Stewart himself is that he is - a false brother! That means he can't be a credible witness or source if you can't tell which ones are true and which ones are false. He is a man that Christians must stay away from as a source and not have fellowship with. If you're still reading Jesus-is-Savior then I suggest do what I did - I stopped reading the site! It's because it drove me paranoid with almost everything aside from his inconsistency. Avoid reading that site! It's just another trap door of the Devil just like the very false religions he criticizes!

See also: