Skip to main content

The Dangerous Heresy That You Can Be Saved From Hell But Not From Sin

It's safe to assume why so many Easy "Christians" want to reject Charles H. Spurgeon is not only because he was a Reformed Baptist theologian but also because he always attacked the notion of Antinomianism. Any born again Christian is bound to go crazy hearing the idea that a person can get saved yet still remain in one's sins. This is to teach that it's possible to be only saved from Hell but not from sin. Did they even bother to read the Bible to find out that Matthew 1:21 says that Jesus came to save His people from their sins and not in their sins? Did they even bother to see that the Bible always speaks that true faith will result to good works (Ephesians 2:8-10, Titus 2:11-14 and James 2:14-23) and that people are to be judged by their fruits (Matthew 7:14-20). Even some non-Calvinist brothers and sisters in Christ reject the very idea that a person can get saved and remain the same.

If there's any doctrine that Calvinist Christians and non-Calvinists can agree on is that true converts can be distinguished from false converts. There's a different view of the perseverance of the saints but only in slight comparison. Both believe that true converts will persevere to the end. Non-Calvinists like David W. Cloud or late preachers like Aiden W. Tozer, Harren A. Ironside and J. Vernon McGee all still believed that true conversion lasts and false converts will never produce good fruit. The Easy "Christians" may call them Pharisees but Jesus told people to examine people by their fruits. There's no such thing as a Christianity that allows a person to be on their way to Heaven without any change.

Claiming that some Christians will never grow or bear even a single fruit is against God's character. It would also be against God's character to leave people barren in their sins and leave them alone to bear fruit. You could see in John 15:1-8 that Jesus talks about the useless branches and the branches. There's no way that the Christians would represent the false branches. They are the branches that are pruned by the Father so they could bear much fruit. The Father knows Christians will bear fruit but He is never satisfied at their current state. Hebrews 12:5-7 says that God chastises those He loves. Titus 2:11-14 says that God's grace teaches righteous living. It's impossible to find even one verse to suggest that a person can get saved and still remain the same. That whole idea is repulsive because true grace teaches righteousness and delivers from sinful living. Yet we still have a lot of heretics out there who continue to insist in fruitless Christianity.

Every true child of God acknowledges that they're saved from both Hell and sin. To be saved from Hell is to be saved from sin. It's sin that causes people to go to Hell. God hates sin because it's sin that sends every unsaved person to Hell. But what's so sad is that so many people just want to be saved only from Hell but not from sin which is just impossible. What's worse is that so many people today recite the sinner's prayer but they are never truly converted. They never understood the Gospel. They want Jesus as Savior but not as Lord. There's no apology in saying that Jesus is Lord and He has every right to be the Lord of your life. If your Jesus isn't the Lord of your olife and then you have never been saved to start with.

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Ken Ham's Illustrations on Spiritual Warfare Against Humanism

Dr. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis made these beautiful illustrations to show what's wrong with the church today. Let's take a look at the two illustrations on how Christians engage their spiritual warfare. 
The first illustration reveals the following:
One member is asleep when he should be doing something.Another person is firing at the balloons because the person who's supposed to fire it is asleep on the job.Somebody is focused on deflecting cannon balls than hitting the source of the cannon balls.Somebody is treating the whole situation like a game.  
By doing so, humanism is victorious whenever the local church is asleep. This is the problem to why Christians tend to fall down in battle at times:
Ezekiel 22:30 And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before Me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none.
In short, if you're not going to stand in the gap on behalf of the land then who will? It's the…

The Ridiculous Roman Catholic View That Marriage Must Be Done Inside Their Church or It's Invalid

I remembered reading through the seven sacraments or ordinances of the Roman Catholic institution in a catechism. One of the teachings is that marriage must be treated as a sacrament. What it also implies is that if your marriage is done in a civil court that even if it was duly registered, that both couples were in a sexually pure union then it's not a marriage. So does that mean that a person can marry in a civil court, get divorced and marry his next spouse in the Roman Catholic institution?

Let's address the issue of civil marriage that is pure and holy. In short there was no incest, no adultery and it was between two people who are eligible for marriage. So why should the Roman Catholic institution even think that two people who got married with the sexually pure prerequisites in the eyes of God should be rejected. Is it because unless it's a priest who performs the marriage then the marriage can't be validated? It's a problem with how Roman Catholics have thei…

No Moral Absolutes Means No Human Rights

We have the truth that human rights activists are everywhere who reject the truth that there are moral absolutes. Many of them have their idea of "Judge not and you will not be judged." As for the atheistic human activists, they tend to carry out Richard Dawkins' quote from the River Out of Eden which says that there's no good, no evil but only pitiless indifference. They think that there are no such thing as moral absolutes. So if they believe that there are no moral absolutes then why are they fighting for human rights which requires moral absolutes to determine them? After all, Dawkins just said there is no purpose but only pitiless indifference.

Here's another problem with atheists' appeal to human rights. Why do they appeal to human rights when they claim that there are no moral absolutes and morality is relative? Human rights are determined by moral absolutes that God made. When God made His Ten Commandments and gave the whole Law - He made it as the st…

James 2 DOES NOT Teach Works Salvation

In a hasty attempt to defend works salvation, they would appeal to James 2.  It would be time to actually clear the fact that Paul and James DO NOT contradict each other. James 2 DOES NOT teach works salvation in which now can be clearly seen when this whole chapter is being dissected to show that James 2 does not defend the heretic crowd.  So let's try to check out what James 2 really is saying.
So first, it's time to think about these facts to debunk the heretical argument of using James 2:
1.) James 2:14-18 is not talking about works salvation but rather, again showing one's faith by one's works.  James 2:18 is a challenge to show one's faith.  Want to know about faith?  Hebrews 11 talks about the results of faith with some of the heroes of the Bible.  Try to coincide Hebrews 11 and James 2 and one sees the results of faith.  As said, when one says that a faith without works is DEAD because true faith produces good works to validate faith.  That's really th…

Does Salvation by Grace Through Faith in Jesus Christ Grant a License to Sin?

Here's a commonly heard argument saying, "Well salvation by faith alone in Jesus Christ is unjust and grants a license to sin." which is frequently done by most world religions.  They demand people must work for their salvation and for one, it's NOT even realistic or practical as it promotes the idea of a dictator God PLUS it's nothing more than asking for the impossible because God's standard of holiness is a LOT higher than all the good works man does.  Despite all the good man does, still they will fall into sin and the followers of almost every false religion this world has to offer shows that like how your average religious person attends religious services yet he/she falls into sin for the rest of the week, showing he/she is WEAK in the flesh.
Now it's time to really correct the whole erroneous argument as false.  Why?  The Bible says otherwise about what God's salvation by grace through faith really does- it transforms the individual to resist…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

What's Wrong with the Ang Dating Daan Movement?

The Ang Dating Daan movement is by the Members Church of God International spearheaded by its pastor (and so-called "prophet") Eliseo Soriano.  While claiming to be an expositor of the Scriptures with his "Itanong Mo Kay Soriano" or "Ask Soriano" In English, this religious group actually isn't Christian as some of the ignorant would want to believe.  Though the group claims the Bible is their only authority (as some cults do) but the problem is that they believe only Eli Soriano may interpret the Scriptures.  This is utter heresy!  Not even a great man in the Scriptures, Charles Spurgeon ever made such a preposterous claim!  This is no better than the "true church" movement by Darwin Fish which is exposed by Pastor Phil Johnson as a heretical movement.  In fact, I'm not going to waste my time debating with ADD members, they are a total waste of my time as every other debate.
Unlike John F. Macarthur of Grace to You that actually encoura…